The bulk update request #7608 is pending approval.

create alias two-piece_swimsuit (89667) -> bikini (89310)
create alias two_piece_swimsuit (22) -> bikini (89310)

Reason: This is just the same thing as a bikini, isn't it? That seems to be all these tags are used for, in any case.

Do we tag tankinis as bikinis?

nimphia said:
Do we tag tankinis as bikinis?

It typically (or always?) contains a bikini_bottom, which on its own implies bikini, so following that logic it should count.

Should a lone bikini bottom really imply bikini, though?

nimphia said:
Do we tag tankinis as bikinis?

Well, the name sort of implies that it's a type of bikini, so... sure, why not?
The alternative here is to have both bikini and tankini imply two-piece_swimsuit, which sounds a bit pointless.

scaliespe said:
The alternative here is to have both bikini and tankini imply two-piece_swimsuit, which sounds a bit pointless.

This would then result in bikini_bottom -> bikini -> two-piece_swimsuit, which is surely even more wrong.

faucet said:
This would then result in bikini_bottom -> bikini -> two-piece_swimsuit, which is surely even more wrong.

Right. Then the solution would be to remove the bikini_bottom and bikini_top implications from bikini. That doesn’t sound good either.

So yeah, still in favor of with aliasing two-piece to bikini and being done with it.