The bulk update request #6952 has been rejected.

create implication all_eight_eeveelutions (0) -> vaporeon (14826)
create implication all_eight_eeveelutions (0) -> jolteon (7517)
create implication all_eight_eeveelutions (0) -> flareon (7113)
create implication all_eight_eeveelutions (0) -> espeon (9229)
create implication all_eight_eeveelutions (0) -> umbreon (19765)
create implication all_eight_eeveelutions (0) -> leafeon (7715)
create implication all_eight_eeveelutions (0) -> glaceon (12873)
create implication all_eight_eeveelutions (0) -> sylveon (16070)

Reason: apparently, this is a tag that i learned existed.

you can downvote as voting to invalidate this tag. otherwise, should be self explanatory

EDIT: The bulk update request #6952 (forum #394067) has been rejected by @slyroon.

are we just going to nuke this tag when another eeveelution is inevitably added?

i mean, other franchise's groups like mane six to refer main cast of my little pony is aliased to friendship is magic so this kind of nullified the point of having this tag.

snake-girl said:
i mean, other franchise's groups like mane six to refer main cast of my little pony is aliased to friendship is magic so this kind of nullified the point of having this tag.

we do have a few group character tags, like off_the_hook_(splatoon) and cutie_mark_crusaders_(mlp), but I think all of them should probably be either redefined to be more than just "all characters from <group> in a single post" or just done away with if that's not possible.

Voting to alias to eeveelution because eeveelution evolutionary_family should cover this, i think
(Hybrids and images with a full other evolutionary family and one eeveelution still show up, but i think it's still the best option)

The bulk update request #6952 (forum #394067) has been rejected by @slyroon.

sipothac said:
are we just going to nuke this tag when another eeveelution is inevitably added?

then just add it as an implication, not exactly the hardest add.

but in the end.
so alias to eeveelution instead of invalidating?
I can make the alias request if that's what ya'll would like.

benjiboyo said:
then just add it as an implication, not exactly the hardest add.

if there was a 9th eeveelution then it wouldn't be "all_eight_eeveelutions" anymore, would it? and even if it was just all_eeveelutions, all the posts with the tag that existed prior would be instantly mistagged if another eeveelution was revealed and the tag would need to be nuked.

benjiboyo said:

so alias to eeveelution instead of invalidating?
I can make the alias request if that's what ya'll would like.

It has already been done all eight eeveelutions

isnt the eeveelution tag already sufficient?

sipothac said:
if there was a 9th eeveelution then it wouldn't be "all_eight_eeveelutions" anymore, would it? and even if it was just all_eeveelutions, all the posts with the tag that existed prior would be instantly mistagged if another eeveelution was revealed and the tag would need to be nuked.

somehow missed the eight part...

snpthecat said:
It has already been done all eight eeveelutions

that was quick