The bulk update request #6896 is active.

create implication antelope_penis (29) -> animal_penis (368265)
create implication camelid_penis (9) -> animal_penis (368265)
create implication gastropod_penis (152) -> animal_penis (368265)
create implication giraffe_penis (50) -> animal_penis (368265)
create implication hyaenid_penis (203) -> animal_penis (368265)
create implication lutrine_penis (65) -> animal_penis (368265)
create implication ostrich_penis (28) -> animal_penis (368265)
create implication rhino_penis (30) -> animal_penis (368265)
create implication seal_penis (13) -> animal_penis (368265)
create implication tapir_penis (43) -> animal_penis (368265)
create implication thylacine_penis (56) -> animal_penis (368265)
create implication claspers (258) -> animal_genitalia (529865)
create implication camelid_pussy (8) -> animal_pussy (3)
create implication lagomorph_pussy (5) -> animal_pussy (3)
create implication lutrine_pussy (10) -> animal_pussy (3)

Reason: let me know if I'm still missing some I just pulled the list off the wiki I swear these furries dig up more knowledge of animal junk every time I turn around

also why the fuck are the auto-generated implications lists in the wiki not alphabetized that made this so much harder than it needed to be

EDIT: The bulk update request #6896 (forum #393520) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

Not to be a dick, but giraffe_penis already implies animal_penis

Yeah there was so much to dig through it's no wonder I lost track.

I wonder if it's a good idea to tag extinct species with little/no reference material and no consistent portrayal. With thylacine_penis there's a ton of variation in length of bifurcation, shape, length, and details. Existing, easy-to-access reference material is two drawings made pre-extinction (neither show bifurcation) and a taxidermy mount (which does appear bifurcated but it's also hard to say how accurate it is).

Perhaps a speculative_penis tag for things that are intended to be animal penises, but can only be the artist's invention or best guess due to either a lack of reference material or not resembling existing references.

The bulk update request #6896 (forum #393520) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.