These new adaptations to the voluptuous tag(voluptuous_female, voluptuous_anthro, ect. ect.) make me a little twitchy when I see them, because they don't also automatically add the voluptuous tag when used on a pic.. could we have these adaptations to the voluptuous tag do that, automatically add voluptuous when used?

You will need to create an implication request. In the meantime I have added the missing tags myself.

voluptuous_* -voluptuous

kemonophonic said:
You will need to create an implication request. In the meantime I have added the missing tags myself.

voluptuous_* -voluptuous

Huh, how exactly do I do that? I mean, I see the button above, but I don't know what to type in the page that shows up.. am I actually trying to contact a mod or something?

On second thought, a BUR would probably be better. Not sure if these voluptuous_* tags should imply voluptuous or be aliased to voluptuous.

Bumping this. Knowing that tag clutter is a concern, should the subtags of voluptuous all be aliased to the base tag? The opposite, creating implications on the subtags, was already rejected at topic #36859, topic #36860
There are some still some pending AIBURs regarding these tags: topic #42933, & topic #35848 (a less extensive version of the rejected 36859)

As it is now, there are separate tags like voluptuous_female, voluptuous_anthro etc. but none of them imply voluptuous, female, anthro, etc.