The bulk update request #5632 has been rejected.

create implication incestuous_voyeur (0) -> voyeur (11194)
create implication pseudo_incestuous_voyeur (5) -> voyeur (11194)
create alias technically_incestuous_voyeur (0) -> pseudo_incestuous_voyeur (5)

Reason: I just created and populated these tags and they need basic implications.

EDIT: The bulk update request #5632 (forum #378230) has been rejected by @spe.

technically_incestuous_voyeur should be renamed, IMO. There is a pending BUR to rename technical_incest to pseudo_incest, as it more accurately describes what it is.

watsit said:
technically_incestuous_voyeur should be renamed, IMO. There is a pending BUR to rename technical_incest to pseudo_incest, as it more accurately describes what it is.

Done, thanks. I agree that is a better name.

The bulk update request #7794 is active.

create implication pseudo_incestuous_voyeur_(lore) (71) -> voyeur (11194)
create implication incestuous_voyeur_(lore) (912) -> voyeur (11194)

Reason: Now with the lore form

EDIT: The bulk update request #7794 (forum #402612) has been approved by @spe.

The bulk update request #5632 (forum #378230) has been rejected by @spe.

The bulk update request #7794 (forum #402612) has been approved by @spe.