The tag alias #62171 attractionless_orientation_play -> orientation_play is pending approval.

Reason: Overly specific and requires taggers to guess "what a character is genuinely [not] attracted to". And then guess if they are still not attracted to that same sex "later on in the image", even if there is no "later on".

For example, post #3843500 the female has two interlocked female sexual symbols on her crotch. The tagger assumed that this means that the character is gay, and therefor not attracted to males.

It is possible to have these symbols tattooed on you and not be gay... Sure, it implies she's gay, but you don't actually see any actual gay happening, or any concrete statement stating she is gay, so it violates TWYS.

For post #3965331,

Lastly, how is one supposed to tell if a character has become "attracted" to another, if having consensual sex for some reason doesn't count? In almost every image with this tag, the characters appear to be enjoying each other...

There are other tags that would work for images like this, such as accidentally_gay, accidentally_straight, etc.

The only image this tag really makes sense for is post #3994546, and even then that's just accidentally_gay