The tag implication #50369 vaginal_penetration -> sex has been rejected.

Reason: It is rare that when using the tag vaginal_penetration sex is not automatically included, almost always when there is vaginal penetration it is because they are having sex within the post

EDIT: The tag implication vaginal_penetration -> sex (forum #361082) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

If it's not always, then I don't think it deserves an implication. '3'

vaginal penetration can involve penetration by sex toys, no? vaginal_penetration sex_toy_insertion ~8k posts

Fair reminder that masturbation isn't sex.

m3g4p0n1 said:
If it's not always, then I don't think it deserves an implication. '3'

vaginal penetration can involve penetration by sex toys, no? vaginal_penetration sex_toy_insertion ~8k posts

Fair reminder that masturbation isn't sex.

you have a good point, but it doesn't make sense that

"vaginal_sex -> vaginal_penetration"

they should be separate tags in that case

The tag implication vaginal_penetration -> sex (forum #361082) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.