Topic: [APPROVED] Tag implication: carrying_position -> carrying_partner

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The tag implication #49762 carrying_position -> carrying_partner has been approved.

Reason: While I wasn't sure about whether carrying_position should've been aliased to implicated to carrying_partner at first, it seems that carrying _position is being used for instances of carrying_partner that include penetration.

EDIT: The tag implication carrying_position -> carrying_partner (forum #355924) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

Updated by auto moderator

It appears we prefer the stand_and_carry_position/reverse_stand_and_carry_position tags instead of carrying_position. Possibly to disambiguate against cases where the supporting partner is not standing e.g. belly_riding.I would support imply stand_and_carry_position -> carrying_partner per the wiki definition of stand_and_carry_position, and either aliasing or canonizing or disambiguating carrying_position.

Having reread the wiki for stand_and_carry_position, it seems carry_position is canonical but has no wiki entry. While carry_position does need cleanup, I support this implication.

Updated