The tag implication #49741 keke_(artist) -> kekeflipnote has been rejected.

Reason: And if possible vice-versa. kekeflipnote is always a copyright of keke and it's strange that either tag is missing when they should both be there, the only one exception would be if another artist is using keke's characters in their art.

EDIT: The tag implication keke_(artist) -> kekeflipnote (forum #355701) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

two questions: what is Kekeflipnote, since there is no description in it's wiki page; and why should keke_(artist), an artist tag, imply it, since it's a copyright tag. copyright tags only get tagged if they're present in the image in some way, shape, or form... if, for example, it's a program Keke uses to draw artwork, then if Keke draws/drew an image without using it or if it's not recognizable then it wouldn't get tagged.

I assume, currently, the kekeflipnote copyright tag is being used when a artwork is made in the keke's style, which is pretty unique as far as I can see.
So it's only natural that the artist will do his own artstyle, it sounds weird though.

https://twitter.com/Kekeflipnote?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNdNkUfhFfzBtKRU_5QgUvw
https://www.instagram.com/kekeflipnote/?hl=en
https://www.facebook.com/Kekeflipnote/

m3g4p0n1 said:
I assume, currently, the kekeflipnote copyright tag is being used when a artwork is made in the keke's style, which is pretty unique as far as I can see.
So it's only natural that the artist will do his own artstyle, it sounds weird though.

https://twitter.com/Kekeflipnote?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNdNkUfhFfzBtKRU_5QgUvw
https://www.instagram.com/kekeflipnote/?hl=en
https://www.facebook.com/Kekeflipnote/

if that was the case, it still assumes that Keke will always draw in that art style, never once changing at all. this isn't how drawing art works, though, since the process of drawing is also the process of improving or altering, the things they drew years ago isn't going to look the same as the things they draw now, in some minor or major way. vice versa, they can always choose to try out a new art style, so this implication would bank on that they both don't change their art style or deliberately draw in another... realistically, that's not going to work.

m3g4p0n1 said:
I assume, currently, the kekeflipnote copyright tag is being used when a artwork is made in the keke's style, which is pretty unique as far as I can see.

We don't tag art styles, particularly the art style of an individual artist that can and does change.

post #2107558 post #2027078 post #2649576 post #2489803

Even within their flipnote animations, these all look different. And of the 6 kekeflipnote posts that aren't keke, 4 look nothing like their flipnote animations, and the other 2 only vaguely resemble their work. So IMO, kekeflipnote should be invalidated. Perhaps remove it from the 6 posts that isn't theirs, and alias it to keke_(artist).

watsit said:
We don't tag art styles, particularly the art style of an individual artist that can and does change.

post #2107558 post #2027078 post #2649576 post #2489803

Even within their flipnote animations, these all look different. And of the 6 kekeflipnote posts that aren't keke, 4 look nothing like their flipnote animations, and the other 2 only vaguely resemble their work. So IMO, kekeflipnote should be invalidated. Perhaps remove it from the 6 posts that isn't theirs, and alias it to keke_(artist).

kekeflipnote is the channel's name on youtube and the copyright is for their characters, not the artstyle. I dont know why this is the first thing that's coming to your mind.

Anyway I wouldnt mind either way. I was puzzled by the fact that there are 2 tags for a single artist. The implication would fix that annoyance as much as moving all the posts to keke_(artist) would. So alias it, implicate it, delete it, whatever just do something about it

wolfmanfur said:
kekeflipnote is the channel's name on youtube and the copyright is for their characters, not the artstyle. I dont know why this is the first thing that's coming to your mind.

I often have dummy opinions and ideas, that's pretty good to see how something can/will be mis-used in the future.

Anyway I wouldnt mind either way. I was puzzled by the fact that there are 2 tags for a single artist. The implication would fix that annoyance as much as moving all the posts to keke_(artist) would. So alias it, implicate it, delete it, whatever just do something about it

Then the implication is also wrong, because the artist can draw art that does not have the artist's characters.

wolfmanfur said:
kekeflipnote is the channel's name on youtube and the copyright is for their characters, not the artstyle. I dont know why this is the first thing that's coming to your mind.

We don't tag character owners. And even if we did, they can draw things that aren't their characters, so this implication wouldn't be valid for that. Many of the posts under the tag have no characters of theirs (they don't own detective pikachu, animal crossing/agresuko, random real-life snow leapard, or random real-life fox, among many others), so that's not what the tag is being used for. If kekeflipnote is what they go by on some sites that some people may tag as the artist, then it should be aliased to their main artist tag.

The tag implication keke_(artist) -> kekeflipnote (forum #355701) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.