Topic: [APPROVED] Tag implication: color_jockstrap -> jockstrap

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #2352 is active.

create alias gray_jockstrap (0) -> grey_jockstrap (28)
create implication black_jockstrap (347) -> jockstrap (21138)
create implication blue_jockstrap (189) -> jockstrap (21138)
create implication brown_jockstrap (12) -> jockstrap (21138)
create implication green_jockstrap (126) -> jockstrap (21138)
create implication grey_jockstrap (28) -> jockstrap (21138)
create implication multicolored_jockstrap (170) -> jockstrap (21138)
create implication orange_jockstrap (78) -> jockstrap (21138)
create implication pink_jockstrap (86) -> jockstrap (21138)
create implication purple_jockstrap (106) -> jockstrap (21138)
create implication red_jockstrap (340) -> jockstrap (21138)
create implication tan_jockstrap (0) -> jockstrap (21138)
create implication two_tone_jockstrap (54) -> multicolored_jockstrap (170)
create implication white_jockstrap (288) -> jockstrap (21138)
create implication yellow_jockstrap (81) -> jockstrap (21138)

Reason: Colored jockstraps are jockstraps

EDIT: The bulk update request #2352 (forum #332976) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #2353 is active.

create implication black_jockstrap (347) -> black_underwear (18457)
create implication blue_jockstrap (189) -> blue_underwear (8037)
create implication brown_jockstrap (12) -> brown_underwear (462)
create implication green_jockstrap (126) -> green_underwear (3750)
create implication grey_jockstrap (28) -> grey_underwear (1643)
create implication orange_jockstrap (78) -> orange_underwear (1323)
create implication pink_jockstrap (86) -> pink_underwear (11481)
create implication purple_jockstrap (106) -> purple_underwear (4359)
create implication red_jockstrap (340) -> red_underwear (9876)
create implication tan_jockstrap (0) -> tan_underwear (166)
create implication two_tone_jockstrap (54) -> two_tone_underwear (938)
create implication white_jockstrap (288) -> white_underwear (20345)
create implication yellow_jockstrap (81) -> yellow_underwear (1988)

Reason: Colored jockstraps are Colored underwear

EDIT: The bulk update request #2353 (forum #332977) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

Updated by auto moderator

implicate translucent_jockstrap -> jockstrap # duplicate of implication #24403
implicate translucent_jockstrap -> translucent_underwear # duplicate of implication #24388

Please, fix errors in your BURs next time.
Running the script through the debugger never hurts.