Topic: [APPROVED] Tag implication: color_jockstrap -> jockstrap

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #2352 is active.

create alias gray_jockstrap (0) -> grey_jockstrap (28)
create implication black_jockstrap (347) -> jockstrap (21107)
create implication blue_jockstrap (189) -> jockstrap (21107)
create implication brown_jockstrap (12) -> jockstrap (21107)
create implication green_jockstrap (126) -> jockstrap (21107)
create implication grey_jockstrap (28) -> jockstrap (21107)
create implication multicolored_jockstrap (170) -> jockstrap (21107)
create implication orange_jockstrap (78) -> jockstrap (21107)
create implication pink_jockstrap (86) -> jockstrap (21107)
create implication purple_jockstrap (106) -> jockstrap (21107)
create implication red_jockstrap (339) -> jockstrap (21107)
create implication tan_jockstrap (0) -> jockstrap (21107)
create implication two_tone_jockstrap (54) -> multicolored_jockstrap (170)
create implication white_jockstrap (288) -> jockstrap (21107)
create implication yellow_jockstrap (81) -> jockstrap (21107)

Reason: Colored jockstraps are jockstraps

EDIT: The bulk update request #2352 (forum #332976) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #2353 is active.

create implication black_jockstrap (347) -> black_underwear (18441)
create implication blue_jockstrap (189) -> blue_underwear (8029)
create implication brown_jockstrap (12) -> brown_underwear (460)
create implication green_jockstrap (126) -> green_underwear (3741)
create implication grey_jockstrap (28) -> grey_underwear (1642)
create implication orange_jockstrap (78) -> orange_underwear (1321)
create implication pink_jockstrap (86) -> pink_underwear (11476)
create implication purple_jockstrap (106) -> purple_underwear (4353)
create implication red_jockstrap (339) -> red_underwear (9866)
create implication tan_jockstrap (0) -> tan_underwear (166)
create implication two_tone_jockstrap (54) -> two_tone_underwear (937)
create implication white_jockstrap (288) -> white_underwear (20334)
create implication yellow_jockstrap (81) -> yellow_underwear (1986)

Reason: Colored jockstraps are Colored underwear

EDIT: The bulk update request #2353 (forum #332977) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

Updated by auto moderator

implicate translucent_jockstrap -> jockstrap # duplicate of implication #24403
implicate translucent_jockstrap -> translucent_underwear # duplicate of implication #24388

Please, fix errors in your BURs next time.
Running the script through the debugger never hurts.