Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #44041 anus_only -> anus has been rejected.
Reason: requires having a character's anus but no other nether parts visible
EDIT: The tag implication anus_only -> anus (forum #332143) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.
Updated by auto moderator
What if the anus is obscured due to a sex_toy (e.g., buttplug_in_ass) or fluids (e.g., excessive cum_from_ass)?
post #2860208 post #2628634
thegreatwolfgang said:
What if the anus is obscured due to a sex_toy (e.g., buttplug_in_ass) or fluids (e.g., excessive cum_from_ass)?
post #2860208 post #2628634
The second image could be either orifice, but there's definitely something about having a something obscuring it. You know it's there, but you can't actually see it.
post #2855052 post #3009202
Internals, censors, etcetera can cause it too.
If we go off the tag's wiki, it's only for when it is visible, so if it was hidden it wouldn't be getting the tag anyway.
Yeah… this implication is correct according to the wiki. If the anus is obscured, even by a sex toy, it shouldn’t get the anus_only tag.
votp said:
If we go off the tag's wiki, it's only for when it is visible, so if it was hidden it wouldn't be getting the tag anyway.
scaliespe said:
Yeah… this implication is correct according to the wiki. If the anus is obscured, even by a sex toy, it shouldn’t get the anus_only tag.
No, the wiki said exposed, it made no reference to the visibility of it. Having a little bit of cum obscuring the entry point does not magically make it NOT anus_only.
In general, anus_only means having "their anus but not their genitals" exposed. It may include underwear cutouts or clothing tears to only allow the anus to be exposed, or in "some other means covering their genitals, possibly in bondage, so as to make only their anus accessible for viewing or sex."
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exposed
Perhaps the wording of anus_only should be changed for clarity, then?
thegreatwolfgang said:
No, the wiki said exposed, it made no reference to the visibility of it. Having a little bit of cum obscuring the entry point does not magically make it NOT anus_only.
In general, anus_only means having "their anus but not their genitals" exposed. It may include underwear cutouts or clothing tears to only allow the anus to be exposed, or in "some other means covering their genitals, possibly in bondage, so as to make only their anus accessible for viewing or sex."
Well, the anus is visible in both of your examples.
scaliespe said:
Well, the anus is visible in both of your examples.
Yes, that is the gist for anus_only (i.e., having your anus exposed through gaps in clothing), not anus (i.e., having your anus visible and not obscured).
I'm not saying they are mutually exclusive from one another, they can both exist on the same post at once. Just like how cum_from_ass doesn't imply anus.
thegreatwolfgang said:
Yes, that is the gist for anus_only (i.e., having your anus exposed through gaps in clothing), not anus (i.e., having your anus visible and not obscured).I'm not saying they are mutually exclusive from one another, they can both exist on the same post at once. Just like how cum_from_ass doesn't imply anus.
I’m still not sure this tag should be used unless you can actually see the anus. Unless it’s actually visible, how do you know it’s not covered by something? Even if there’s an opening in the clothing, maybe the anus is covered by a thong or something like maebari but for the anus.
The tag implication anus_only -> anus (forum #332143) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.
