Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: tentacles_past_cervix -> tentacle_penetration

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

EDIT: see https://e621.net/bulk_update_requests/2028

The tag implication #43458 tentacles_past_cervix -> tentacle_penetration has been rejected.

Reason: tentacles must penetrate to make it past the cervix.

It should also be added to the Tentacle Actions section of tentacles.

Also should imply cervical_penetration, uterus, internal.

However, there could be tentacles inside the womb, without being shown as entering. Should that be another tag, or should this not imply?

EDIT: The tag implication tentacles_past_cervix -> tentacle_penetration (forum #327339) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

Updated by auto moderator

You can use a BUR to request multiple implications at the same time.

imply tentacles_past_cervix -> cervical_penetration
imply tentacles_past_cervix -> uterus
imply tentacles_past_cervix -> internal

furrin_gok said:
You can use a BUR to request multiple implications at the same time.

imply tentacles_past_cervix -> cervical_penetration
imply tentacles_past_cervix -> uterus
imply tentacles_past_cervix -> internal

Some day I'll learn how to use this site. Some day... Thank you!