The tag alias #56010 bluelulucario -> 32d has been rejected.

Reason: I'm 98% sure they're the same person:

• They both focus almost exclusively on Lucario-on-Weavile content either in 2d or 3d
• All uploads for the 32d tag are made by the 32D user , except for a single one which has been uploaded by LuLuK , which also uploaded all the bluelulucario images
• Idk the FA profile pictures and bios are vaguely similar I guess

Conclusion: 32d = 32D = bluelulucario = LuLuK
Half-Life 3 confirmed

EDIT: The tag alias bluelulucario -> 32d (forum #323393) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

If they are the same artist, they're intentionally keeping the 3D separate from the 2D, which I think is grounds for not aliasing them. Still interesting coincidence. Maybe the weavile/lucario were all commissioned by the same guy. How the heck did you notice that?

matrixmash said:
If they are the same artist, they're intentionally keeping the 3D separate from the 2D, which I think is grounds for not aliasing them.

I guess, sure.

matrixmash said:
Maybe the weavile/lucario were all commissioned by the same guy

Nope, even offsite that's all they've ever posted.

matrixmash said:
How the heck did you notice that?

I've been going through unknown_artist arttags:1 -unavailable_at_source posts with the power of reverse image searching, and I noticed that there were quite a few Lucario-on-Weavile posts without an artist, all uploaded by the same guy.
Then I found one from 32D.
"If I had a nickel for every time I saw a Lucario-on-Weavile post without the artist today, I'd have two nickels. Which isn't a lot, but it's weird that it happened twice"

LuLuK and 32D are definitely different users, based on the IP addresses.
Strangely enough, they share an ISP. But that's not conclusive evidence, and I don't see any concrete proof on either one's FA page to link these two together.

Either they are different artists, or one artist deliberately keeping their artwork separate. Either way, an alias is not appropriate here.

The tag alias bluelulucario -> 32d (forum #323393) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.