The bulk update request #1103 is active.

change category no_climax (0) -> invalid

Reason: "no climax" is just... fucking. And technically applies to posts that don't even involve sex. The similar-in-concept ruined_orgasm has also been aliased to invalid_tag.

This tag seems to have been added across posts by a single user whose Dmails are closed, so I can't exactly poke them about it.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1103 (forum #313436) has been approved by @slyroon.

Ehh. I could see a case for it in long animations where you would reasonably expect there to be a climax at some point, considering the amount of time you would have to invest to find that out otherwise. On the other hand, you could simply check for the absence of an orgasm tag, and in any case a lot of the posts currently tagged no_climax appear to be short GIF loops where no such expectation applies.

Also, ruined_orgasm isn't similar in concept at all, and in fact is mutually exclusive with this tag.

The bulk update request #1172 has been rejected.

create alias no_climax (0) -> invalid_tag (1)

Reason: script fix

EDIT: The bulk update request #1172 (forum #314517) has been rejected by @slyroon.

versperus said:
The bulk update request #1172 has been rejected.

create alias no_climax (0) -> invalid_tag (1)

Reason: script fix

No, we've been over this. No more invalid_tag aliases.

versperus said:
The bulk update request #1172 has been rejected.

create alias no_climax (0) -> invalid_tag (1)

Reason: script fix

wat8548 said:
No, we've been over this. No more invalid_tag aliases.

Regardless of whether your BUR is valid, you could've just... asked me to change my BUR.

wat8548 said:
No, we've been over this. No more invalid_tag aliases.

As mentioned before, there are still cases where aliasing to invalid_tag may be appropriate. But in this case, I agree that this one shouldn't be. It'd probably be better to leave no_climax in the Invalid category, with a wiki suggesting to either use orgasm_denial when a character is prevented from climaxing, or simply not tagging orgasm if one doesn't occur.

strikerman said:
Regardless of whether your BUR is valid, you could've just... asked me to change my BUR.

alas I didn't realize it was possible to edit bulk requests, well that or it's that I forgot. Take your pick as I honestly don't recall.

versperus said:
alas I didn't realize it was possible to edit bulk requests, well that or it's that I forgot. Take your pick as I honestly don't recall.

you forgot whether you forgot, nice

The bulk update request #1103 (forum #313436) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #1172 (forum #314517) has been rejected by @slyroon.