The bulk update request #969 has been rejected.

create implication black_thigh_highs (9426) -> black_legwear (18921)
create implication yellow_thigh_highs (188) -> yellow_legwear (521)
create implication grey_thigh_highs (414) -> grey_legwear (1116)
create implication tan_thigh_highs (37) -> tan_legwear (77)
create implication brown_thigh_highs (270) -> brown_legwear (738)
create implication white_thigh_highs (2990) -> white_legwear (6851)
create implication blue_thigh_highs (969) -> blue_legwear (2214)
create implication orange_thigh_highs (218) -> orange_legwear (477)
create implication red_thigh_highs (1119) -> red_legwear (2518)
create implication pink_thigh_highs (1197) -> pink_legwear (2159)
create implication purple_thigh_highs (975) -> purple_legwear (2361)
create implication rainbow_thigh_highs (143) -> rainbow_legwear (543)

Reason: Thigh Highs are a type of legwear so logically the corresponding legwear color tag should be implied.

EDIT: The bulk update request #969 (forum #311220) has been rejected by @slyroon.

Forgot to include.

create implication striped_thigh_highs -> striped_legwear
create implication pattern_thigh_highs -> pattern_legwear

The bulk update request #970 has been rejected.

create implication green_thigh_socks (73) -> green_legwear (1187)
create implication black_thigh_socks (812) -> black_legwear (18921)
create implication yellow_thigh_socks (41) -> yellow_legwear (521)
create implication grey_thigh_socks (48) -> grey_legwear (1116)
create implication tan_thigh_socks (4) -> tan_legwear (77)
create implication brown_thigh_socks (11) -> brown_legwear (738)
create implication blue_thigh_socks (209) -> blue_legwear (2214)
create implication orange_thigh_socks (21) -> orange_legwear (477)
create implication red_thigh_socks (185) -> red_legwear (2518)
create implication pink_thigh_socks (345) -> pink_legwear (2159)
create implication purple_thigh_socks (135) -> purple_legwear (2361)
create implication rainbow_thigh_socks (15) -> rainbow_legwear (543)
create implication multicolored_thigh_socks (718) -> multicolored_legwear (2465)

Reason: Thigh Socks are a type of legwear so logically the corresponding legwear color tag should be implied.

EDIT: The bulk update request #970 (forum #311231) has failed: Error: green_thigh_socks already implies green_legwear through another implication (create implication green_thigh_socks -> green_legwear)

EDIT: The bulk update request #970 (forum #311231) has been rejected by @slyroon.

ariskapp9 said:
Forgot to include.

create implication striped_thigh_highs -> striped_legwear
create implication pattern_thigh_highs -> pattern_legwear

You can add them. Go to the BUR listing page, scroll down to find the BUR, and there should be an Edit link on the right side of your BURs. Though it seems those implications are already made.

watsit said:
You can add them. Go to the BUR listing page, scroll down to find the BUR, and there should be an Edit link on the right side of your BURs. Though it seems striped_thigh_highs already implicates striped_legwear

Upon further looking they're already implied.

I dunno about this... My use of thigh_highs is if a stocking (or any other leg garment) reaches the thighs of the character. If this is actually a type of leg garment separate from stockings, then I'm OK with this, but if it's just a supplementary tag, then this doesn't make sense.

monsterbomb10010 said:
I dunno about this... My use of thigh_highs is if a stocking (or any other leg garment) reaches the thighs of the character. If this is actually a type of leg garment separate from stockings, then I'm OK with this, but if it's just a supplementary tag, then this doesn't make sense.

If I recall correctly the difference is that thigh highs stay up the leg using a built in elastic whereas stockings require the use of garter straps and a belt to stay on the leg correctly. I'm assuming the former would be true of thigh socks also.

Most of the tags on BUR #969 look good, though the implication green_thigh_highs -> green_legwear can probably be removed since it was also submitted as a separate implication on topic #29777. The implication red_thigh_highs -> orange_legwear should also be changed to instead be red_thigh_highs -> red_legwear.

I think all of the tags on BUR #970 should be edited. Instead of implicating *_thigh_socks -> *_legwear, the tags should implicate *_thigh_socks -> *_thigh_highs (since the implication chain of their base tags thigh_socks -> thigh_highs -> legwear would apply to these tags as well).

d.d.m. said:
Most of the tags on BUR #969 look good, though the implication green_thigh_highs -> green_legwear can probably be removed since it was also submitted as a separate implication on topic #29777. The implication red_thigh_highs -> orange_legwear should also be changed to instead be red_thigh_highs -> red_legwear.

I think all of the tags on BUR #970 should be edited. Instead of implicating *_thigh_socks -> *_legwear, the tags should implicate *_thigh_socks -> *_thigh_highs (since the implication chain of their base tags thigh_socks -> thigh_highs -> legwear would apply to these tags as well).

Updated BUR #969 to reflect your suggesstions, BUR #970 isn't needed as the implications of *_thigh_socks -> *_thigh_highs is already approved.

ariskapp9 said:
Updated BUR #969 to reflect your suggesstions, BUR #970 isn't needed as the implications of *_thigh_socks -> *_thigh_high is already approved.

Whoops, my mistake there.

The bulk update request #1005 has been rejected.

create implication rainbow_thigh_socks (15) -> thigh_socks (8082)
create implication multicolored_thigh_socks (718) -> thigh_socks (8082)

Reason: *_thigh_socks are thigh_socks

EDIT: The bulk update request #1005 (forum #311770) has been rejected by @Ariskapp9.

The bulk update request #1005 (forum #311770) has been rejected by @Ariskapp9.

ariskapp9 said:
The bulk update request #1005 has been rejected.

create implication rainbow_thigh_socks (15) -> thigh_socks (8082)
create implication multicolored_thigh_socks (718) -> thigh_socks (8082)

Reason: *_thigh_socks are thigh_socks

EDIT: The bulk update request #1005 (forum #311770) has been rejected by @Ariskapp9.

Just realized it's not needed as per BUR #956, just submitted rainbow_thigh_socks -> thigh_socks as a single implication. topic #29868

The thigh socks will already get the legwear tags through your first BUR. The thigh socks tags imply the thigh highs tags already.

The bulk update request #969 (forum #311220) has been rejected by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #970 (forum #311231) has been rejected by @slyroon.