The bulk update request #653 has been rejected.

create implication chest_fur (2891) -> fur (1898283)
create implication cum_on_fur (920) -> cum (748909)
create implication cum_on_fur (920) -> fur (1898283)
create implication short_fur (994) -> fur (1898283)
create implication black_and_white_fur (0) -> two_tone_fur (138400)
create implication dyed_fur (407) -> fur (1898283)
create implication cosmic_fur (340) -> fur (1898283)
create implication pale_fur (495) -> fur (1898283)
create implication gradient_fur (1398) -> fur (1898283)
create implication gradient_fur (1398) -> multicolored_fur (252133)
create implication patterned_fur (200) -> fur (1898283)
create alias multi_tone_fur (6) -> multicolored_fur (252133)

Reason: As far as I can tell, these are pretty self-explanatory, but I can provide more info if needed.
Will the fur tag likely be disambiguated or invalidated sometime? It seems like 1 in every 3 posts with fur doesn't actually have the tag. (an estimate and exaggeration please don't take that statistic seriously)

EDIT: The bulk update request #653 (forum #304142) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

create implication cum_on_fur -> cum
create implication cum_on_fur -> fur

I think it should imply some intermediate tag like cum_on_body (if that exists, haven't checked) rather than directly to cum, but the fur implication seems fine.

create implication black_and_white_fur -> two_tone_fur

Is this really a valid tag? I know it's a common color combination but it seems like it being a valid tag could cause a mess of tags like red_and_white_fur, yellow_and_purple_fur or even pink,_white_and_brown. Especially when black_fur white_fur two_tone_fur as a search could probably suffice.

create implication turquoise_fur -> fur

I'm not sure if turquoise is a valid color tag, I believe it should be aliased to blue_fur per how other tags have been.

---

Other than that, I don't see any problems with the rest of the BUR.

faucet said:
I think it should imply some intermediate tag like cum_on_body (if that exists, haven't checked) rather than directly to cum, but the fur implication seems fine.

Is this really a valid tag? I know it's a common color combination but it seems like it being a valid tag could cause a mess of tags like red_and_white_fur, yellow_and_purple_fur or even pink,_white_and_brown. Especially when black_fur white_fur two_tone_fur as a search could probably suffice.

I'm not sure if turquoise is a valid color tag, I believe it should be aliased to blue_fur per how other tags have been.

---

Other than that, I don't see any problems with the rest of the BUR.

Yeah, I agree with all of these. My point isn't to permanently change the fur tags to these, just to clean up the loose ends of the loose ends, kinda. I can tell that these tags will eventually be aliased or invalidated, but what could go wrong with these kinda preparations? Plus, when the fur tags do end up being purged, we'll have fewer stragglers.

And for some more specific feedback;
- I do agree about the cum_on_fur -> cum_on_body thing, and I'll probably request that one on its own (single ali/imp requests tend to be checked quicker anyway, in my experience).
- I don't think black_and_white_fur is a valid tag either, but it sure as hell implies fur; I'd say, eventually, that all or most fur color tags involving more than one color should be moved to multicolored_fur, minus things like gradient_fur and patterned_fur.
- I'm not sure either, but I haven't been involved with color tag discussions for long enough to judge for myself, so if someone has some informed input, they can alias that tag themselves.

I got these tags by searching *_fur -fur, just to see which could be cleaned up and clarified, so there are probably plenty of stragglers.

i hope this made sense lmao

-1 because chest_fur, black_and_white_fur, and pale_fur should be aliased instead imo. And dyed_fur aliased to highlights_(coloring).

The bulk update request #653 (forum #304142) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #8640 is pending approval.

create alias chest_fur (2891) -> fur (1898283)
create implication cum_on_fur (920) -> cum_on_body (32111)
create implication cum_on_fur (920) -> fur (1898283)
create implication short_fur (994) -> fur (1898283)
create alias dyed_fur (407) -> highlights_(coloring) (33654)
create alias pale_fur (495) -> fur (1898283)

Reason: Salvaging the BUR

The bulk update request #8641 is pending approval.

create implication gradient_fur (1398) -> fur (1898283)
create alias patterned_fur (200) -> markings (445300)
create implication cosmic_fur (340) -> fur (1898283)

Reason: implying gradient_fur to fur instead because gradient isn't always multicolored (could be greyscale) and tags like gradient hair point to hair instead of multicolored hair

Chose to alias to markings instead of fur. There aren't any non-empty tags which are of the form patterned_*, and pattern_* seems to be reserved for clothing.

Keeping cosmic because cosmic hair exists, though i'm not sure following it's implication of cosmic -> ethereal is a good idea