Topic: [APPROVED] Minecraft implication BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

faucet

Member

The bulk update request #571 is active.

create implication ghast_(minecraft) (120) -> minecraft (6177)
create implication slime_(minecraft) (77) -> minecraft (6177)
create implication spider_(minecraft) (55) -> minecraft (6177)
create implication skeleton_(minecraft) (40) -> minecraft (6177)
create implication blaze_(minecraft) (24) -> minecraft (6177)
create implication the_nether_(minecraft) (103) -> minecraft (6177)
create implication petra_(minecraft) (3) -> minecraft (6177)
create implication jesse_(minecraft) (2) -> minecraft (6177)
create implication wolf_(minecraft) (352) -> minecraft (6177)
create implication alex_(minecraft) (129) -> minecraft (6177)
create implication villager_(minecraft) (29) -> minecraft (6177)
create implication bee_(minecraft) (204) -> minecraft (6177)
create implication ravager_(minecraft) (11) -> minecraft (6177)
create implication vindicator_(minecraft) (0) -> minecraft (6177)
create implication fox_(minecraft) (294) -> minecraft (6177)
create implication warden_(minecraft) (140) -> minecraft (6177)

Reason:

EDIT: The bulk update request #571 (forum #302735) has been approved by @Millcore.

Updated by auto moderator

faucet

Member

furrin_gok said:
Ghast and the_nether shouldn't have a suffix.

I was just creating a BUR for the tags that already existed, but I agree with gattonero2001's links, they're both ambiguous even if nothing else has used those names yet. Especially ghast.