Should the talking to viewer tag apply for first_person_view images where parts of the "viewing" character's body are visible?

For Example:
post #2415722 post #2417976 post #2372798

It seems like the answer is probably yes, but because the literal viewer behind the screen (probably) isn't the anthro horse whose lower body is visible in the image I'm not sure.

It shouldn't, since characters that are partially on-screen aren't tagged viewer.

genjar said:
It shouldn't, since characters that are partially on-screen aren't tagged viewer.

looking_at_viewer *_pov has... many results.

strikerman said:
looking_at_viewer *_pov has... many results.

Yeah, never mind, I got that momentarily confused with the *_pov group.

Still, I find it hard to think of the third post as talking_to_viewer. It's dialogue between two visible characters, whereas the viewer is outside the fourth wall.

genjar said:
Still, I find it hard to think of the third post as talking_to_viewer. It's dialogue between two visible characters, whereas the viewer is outside the fourth wall.

That's the thing, with all first_person_view images, the viewer's perspective is by definition also the perspective of a visible character. Which is why I'm asking.