Topic: [APPROVED] text_on_clothing BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #266 is active.

create implication text_on_armwear (53) -> text_on_clothing (19548)
create implication text_on_arm_warmers (2) -> text_on_armwear (53)
create implication text_on_arm_warmers (2) -> arm_warmers (14566)
create implication text_on_handwear (88) -> text_on_clothing (19548)
create implication text_on_handwear (88) -> handwear (230045)
create implication text_on_gloves (86) -> text_on_handwear (88)
create implication text_on_gloves (86) -> gloves (219293)
create implication text_on_elbow_gloves (29) -> text_on_armwear (53)
create implication text_on_elbow_gloves (29) -> text_on_gloves (86)
create implication text_on_elbow_gloves (29) -> elbow_gloves (45075)
create implication text_on_tank_top (1753) -> text_on_shirt (9662)
create implication text_on_tank_top (1753) -> tank_top (57856)
create implication text_on_vest (64) -> text_on_topwear (12313)
create implication text_on_vest (64) -> vest (25074)
create implication text_on_sweater (206) -> text_on_topwear (12313)
create implication text_on_sweater (206) -> sweater (44347)
create implication text_on_skirt (11) -> text_on_bottomwear (543)
create implication text_on_skirt (11) -> skirt (90475)
create implication text_on_legwear (61) -> text_on_clothing (19548)
create implication text_on_legwear (61) -> legwear (341217)
create implication text_on_leg_warmers (3) -> text_on_legwear (61)
create implication text_on_leg_warmers (3) -> leg_warmers (7605)
create implication text_on_thigh_highs (35) -> text_on_legwear (61)
create implication text_on_thigh_highs (35) -> thigh_highs (152952)
create implication text_on_footwear (144) -> text_on_clothing (19548)
create implication text_on_footwear (144) -> footwear (300181)
create implication text_on_boots (5) -> text_on_footwear (144)
create implication text_on_boots (5) -> boots (86628)
create implication text_on_shoes (86) -> text_on_footwear (144)
create implication text_on_shoes (86) -> shoes (224668)
create implication text_on_socks (50) -> text_on_footwear (144)
create implication text_on_socks (50) -> socks (72571)
create implication text_on_swimwear (324) -> text_on_clothing (19548)
create implication text_on_swimwear (324) -> swimwear (138167)
create implication text_on_dress (25) -> text_on_clothing (19548)
create implication text_on_dress (25) -> dress (97834)
create implication text_on_choker (55) -> choker (50357)
create implication text_on_jewelry (67) -> jewelry (275955)
create implication text_on_scarf (3) -> scarf (52035)

BUR updated to reflect suggested changes

Reason: These text_on_* tags are missing implications. These implications match the structure of all related clothing/accessory tags.

EDIT: The bulk update request #266 (forum #296304) has been approved by @Millcore.

Updated by auto moderator

Gloves are a type of handwear, so text_on_gloves should be implicated to text_on_handwear instead.

Also, odd... how can elbow_gloves be armwear AND handwear at the same time?

monsterbomb10010 said:
Gloves are a type of handwear, so text_on_gloves should be implicated to text_on_handwear instead.

Good catch on that one. I'll have to update the wiki and tags.

Edit: Since I can't change the script, here's the revised implications (also for additional tags that have been created since)
Edit 2: BUR updated to reflect this instead

Updated

monsterbomb10010 said:
Gloves are a type of handwear, so text_on_gloves should be implicated to text_on_handwear instead.

Also, odd... how can elbow_gloves be armwear AND handwear at the same time?

Gloves that only cover hand are handwear, if it covers past the wrists it can become an armwear too, I guess, like opera_gloves, for example.

Also elbow gloves has models that can cover part of the hand, thats why it can be armwear/handwear

Yeah, several types of clothing do fall under multiple categories (such as thigh_socks applying to both footwear and legwear, or corset applying to both topwear and lingerie).

There are a few reservations I have over some of the implications on this BUR.

Other than these, I think the rest of the BUR looks good.