Topic: [APPROVED] text_on_clothing BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #266 is active.

create implication text_on_armwear (53) -> text_on_clothing (19402)
create implication text_on_arm_warmers (2) -> text_on_armwear (53)
create implication text_on_arm_warmers (2) -> arm_warmers (14431)
create implication text_on_handwear (88) -> text_on_clothing (19402)
create implication text_on_handwear (88) -> handwear (227597)
create implication text_on_gloves (86) -> text_on_handwear (88)
create implication text_on_gloves (86) -> gloves (217032)
create implication text_on_elbow_gloves (29) -> text_on_armwear (53)
create implication text_on_elbow_gloves (29) -> text_on_gloves (86)
create implication text_on_elbow_gloves (29) -> elbow_gloves (44656)
create implication text_on_tank_top (1747) -> text_on_shirt (9598)
create implication text_on_tank_top (1747) -> tank_top (57135)
create implication text_on_vest (63) -> text_on_topwear (12224)
create implication text_on_vest (63) -> vest (24730)
create implication text_on_sweater (205) -> text_on_topwear (12224)
create implication text_on_sweater (205) -> sweater (43835)
create implication text_on_skirt (11) -> text_on_bottomwear (542)
create implication text_on_skirt (11) -> skirt (89499)
create implication text_on_legwear (61) -> text_on_clothing (19402)
create implication text_on_legwear (61) -> legwear (338116)
create implication text_on_leg_warmers (3) -> text_on_legwear (61)
create implication text_on_leg_warmers (3) -> leg_warmers (7521)
create implication text_on_thigh_highs (35) -> text_on_legwear (61)
create implication text_on_thigh_highs (35) -> thigh_highs (151289)
create implication text_on_footwear (144) -> text_on_clothing (19402)
create implication text_on_footwear (144) -> footwear (296570)
create implication text_on_boots (5) -> text_on_footwear (144)
create implication text_on_boots (5) -> boots (85517)
create implication text_on_shoes (86) -> text_on_footwear (144)
create implication text_on_shoes (86) -> shoes (221712)
create implication text_on_socks (50) -> text_on_footwear (144)
create implication text_on_socks (50) -> socks (71869)
create implication text_on_swimwear (320) -> text_on_clothing (19402)
create implication text_on_swimwear (320) -> swimwear (136379)
create implication text_on_dress (25) -> text_on_clothing (19402)
create implication text_on_dress (25) -> dress (96802)
create implication text_on_choker (55) -> choker (49719)
create implication text_on_jewelry (67) -> jewelry (273052)
create implication text_on_scarf (3) -> scarf (51530)

BUR updated to reflect suggested changes

Reason: These text_on_* tags are missing implications. These implications match the structure of all related clothing/accessory tags.

EDIT: The bulk update request #266 (forum #296304) has been approved by @Millcore.

Updated by auto moderator

Gloves are a type of handwear, so text_on_gloves should be implicated to text_on_handwear instead.

Also, odd... how can elbow_gloves be armwear AND handwear at the same time?

monsterbomb10010 said:
Gloves are a type of handwear, so text_on_gloves should be implicated to text_on_handwear instead.

Good catch on that one. I'll have to update the wiki and tags.

Edit: Since I can't change the script, here's the revised implications (also for additional tags that have been created since)
Edit 2: BUR updated to reflect this instead

Updated

monsterbomb10010 said:
Gloves are a type of handwear, so text_on_gloves should be implicated to text_on_handwear instead.

Also, odd... how can elbow_gloves be armwear AND handwear at the same time?

Gloves that only cover hand are handwear, if it covers past the wrists it can become an armwear too, I guess, like opera_gloves, for example.

Also elbow gloves has models that can cover part of the hand, thats why it can be armwear/handwear

Yeah, several types of clothing do fall under multiple categories (such as thigh_socks applying to both footwear and legwear, or corset applying to both topwear and lingerie).

There are a few reservations I have over some of the implications on this BUR.

Other than these, I think the rest of the BUR looks good.