The tag implication #32049 cervical_penetration -> cervix has been rejected.

Reason: If you can see them penetrating a cervix, then you can obviously see a cervix for them to penetrate.

You already suggested this a month ago.
topic #26201

...I must've been tired when I made this. Sorry 'bout that...

jacob said:
...I must've been tired when I made this. Sorry 'bout that...

What's more intriguing is that you were able to do it. Normally, you'd get an error and be stopped, but that didn't seem to occur this time. Both requests are pending, too. I wonder what happened.