Implicating straight_to_gay → orientation_play
Link to implication

Reason:

Orientation play involves engaging in sexual acts contrary to one's stated sexual orientation. Straight characters performing homosexual acts (straight-to-gay) is a form of this.

-1 I say they both go to invalid tag.

Sexualities aren't something you can visibly see that well in an image. So... -1.

usually these images include text so +1

FurZ said:
usually these images include text so +1

I don't think this should be one of the exceptions. The orientations we ever tag are literally what's in the image: male/male and such.

AgentParadox said:
Sexualities aren't something you can visibly see that well in an image. So... -1.

Not the majority of the time, but there are examples where an image clearly shows a character engaging (willingly or unwillingly) in acts contrary to their stated orientation. I believe it would be useful to tag such images:

See for examples: post #1870821, post #1579618, post #1627487

post #1070957 post #525603 post #86925

Wait, wait, wait... Years back, I created the stated_heterosexuality tag for this. There was no forum discussion, but it seemed to catch on. But now it seems like there's 5 competing tags for the same thing:

• stated_heterosexuality (+ male/male)
• no_homo (+ male/male)
• straight_to_gay (+ male/male)
• orientation_play (+ male/male)
• accidentally_gay (+ male/male. Caused by gender_confusion)

Perhaps some of these could be aliased together?

----------
For the less common reverse scenario, the competing tags are:

post #485089

• stated_homosexuality (+male/female)
• orientation_play (+male/female)
• accidentally_straight (+male/female)

CrocoGator said:
post #1070957 post #525603 post #86925

Wait, wait, wait... Years back, I created the stated_heterosexuality tag for this. There was no forum discussion, but it seemed to catch on. But now it seems like there's 5 competing tags for the same thing:

• stated_heterosexuality (+ male/male)
• no_homo (+ male/male)
• straight_to_gay (+ male/male)
• orientation_play (+ male/male)
• accidentally_gay (+ male/male. Caused by gender_confusion)

Perhaps some of these could be aliased together?

----------
For the less common reverse scenario, the competing tags are:

post #485089

• stated_homosexuality (+male/female)
• orientation_play (+male/female)
• accidentally_straight (+male/female)

I'd support this, though I think we should settle on a few tags and then manually sift through before making aliases, since some posts in these tags don't strictly apply as straight-to-gay, orientation play, etc.

I also propose to make gay_to_straight a thing, assuming we go through with this.