Implicating mutual_knotting → male/male
Link to implication

Reason:

Well, one person is knotting one person, while that same person is being knotted with the person's knot who they're knotting. That's pretty gay to me.

EDIT: The tag implication mutual_knotting -> male/male (forum #251612) has been rejected by @Millcore.

what about
dickgirls dickbitches

herm
maleherm
dickgirl

I'm not even sure it should necessarily imply knot or penis, given it's totally possibly to do something like this with all relevant penises hidden entirely from view. Somewhere.

20-Shades-Of-Faux-Pa said:
Implicating mutual_knotting → male/male
Link to implication

Reason:

Well, one person is knotting one person, while that same person is being knotted with the person's knot who they're knotting. That's pretty gay to me.

Non males can have a penis too.

20-Shades-Of-Faux-Pa said:

Well, one person is knotting one person, while that same person is being knotted with the person's knot who they're knotting.

Knot confusing at all.

The tag implication mutual_knotting -> male/male (forum #251612) has been rejected by @Millcore.