Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Implicating retracting_foreskin → uncut
Link to implication
Auto explicatory. You need foreskin for it to be retracted.
EDIT: The tag implication retracting_foreskin -> uncut (forum #259707) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.
Updated by auto moderator
Chain it through retracted_foreskin instead.
Updated by anonymous
Genjar said:
Chain it through retracted_foreskin instead.
Yeah, I guess it makes more sense.
Edit: If it happens, I also suggest implicating partially_retracted_foreskin since it is part of the motion.
Updated by anonymous
The tag implication retracting_foreskin -> uncut (forum #259707) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.
