In response to blip #70121
@Tigerkitty: The watermark was just one reason. Even without it, the posts should have been removed for quality reasons.
@Tigerkitty: The watermark was just one reason. Even without it, the posts should have been removed for quality reasons.
@Ratte: I do apologize for letting myself get angry, I just enjoy a more critical audience like this site has because it helps me improve. It may not be meant for amateurs though, thanks for your time
@Ratte: if the watermark is from the application used to make the original image, why is it a problem? I consent to them being removed for quality but with the software I'm using I can't remove it, and I would like to continue being an artist here