The tag implication #68773 glansectomy -> genital_mutilation is pending approval.

Reason: The glansectomy tag is not particularly common but it occurs enough times that I think it has merit and thus this obvious implication (much like penectomy -> genital_mutilation) should be created.

ok but glansectomy can be an actual medical procedure so its not the same as genital mutilation

funkwolfie said:
ok but glansectomy can be an actual medical procedure so its not the same as genital mutilation

I assume castration could surgically be done if someone had testicular cancer. That doesn't change that castration implies genital_mutilation for the purposes of this site.

crocogator said:
I assume castration could surgically be done if someone had testicular cancer. That doesn't change that castration implies genital_mutilation for the purposes of this site.

i mean should circumcised imply mutilated_genital then?

funkwolfie said:
i mean should circumcised imply mutilated_genital then?

Circumcised shouldn't, but circumcision already does.