The tag implication #68594 non_oviparous_oviposition -> oviposition is pending approval.

Reason: Just because it isn't laid by an oviparous species doesn't mean its not oviposition! This tag should always have oviposition, as it is depicting it from a unusual species. This parallels how non-mammal_breasts implies breasts.

I'm not-- sure if non_oviparous_oviposition is really a good tag at least with its current definition...

the way oviposition is used includes any instance of any amount of any type of eggs leaving one character's body from any orifice, regardless of the eggs' origin. so, this tag would be conflating the relative mundanity of a human character manually inserting something like a chicken egg into themselves and then pushing it out with the biological impossibility of a horse becoming pregnant and that pregnancy resulting in it laying a clutch of eggs.

also, having exception in this tag for stuff like pokémon feels weird. we generally treat the biological function/features of fictional species as external knowledge (it's why we don't take the cleft_tail into account when tagging a pikachu character's gender), so, knowing that all pokémon are (probably) entirely oviparous wouldn't be TWYS.