The bulk update request #11661 is active.

create alias tic_tac (0) -> tic_tac_(candy) (6)
create alias tic-tac (0) -> tic_tac_(candy) (6)
create alias tictac (0) -> tic_tac_(candy) (6)
create alias tik_tak (0) -> tic_tac_(candy) (6)
create alias tik-tak (0) -> tic_tac_(candy) (6)
create alias tiktak (0) -> tic_tac_(candy) (6)
create implication tic_tac_(candy) (6) -> candy (26574)

Reason: Aliases for discoverability, and putting "_(candy)" in the tag to avoid confusion with TikTok.

Gonna be honest, I forgot Tic Tac was spelled with "c".

EDIT: The bulk update request #11661 (forum #458822) has been approved by @spe.

aaronfranke said:
The bulk update request #11661 is active.

create alias tic_tac (0) -> tic_tac_(candy) (6)
create alias tic-tac (0) -> tic_tac_(candy) (6)
create alias tictac (0) -> tic_tac_(candy) (6)
create alias tik_tak (0) -> tic_tac_(candy) (6)
create alias tik-tak (0) -> tic_tac_(candy) (6)
create alias tiktak (0) -> tic_tac_(candy) (6)
create implication tic_tac_(candy) (6) -> candy (26574)

Reason: Aliases for discoverability, and putting "_(candy)" in the tag to avoid confusion with TikTok.

Gonna be honest, I forgot Tic Tac was spelled with "c".

This looks excessive for one candy with 6 uses

aren't they considered mints?

dba_afish said:
aren't they considered mints?

mints in this case are a type of candy

The bulk update request #11661 (forum #458822) has been approved by @spe.