The bulk update request #11657 is pending approval.
create alias uvap (0) -> uncensored_version_at_paywall (207)
Reason: Standardizing more of this meta tag family, will have part two since uvas should not be for the unavailable tag.
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The bulk update request #11657 is pending approval.
create alias uvap (0) -> uncensored_version_at_paywall (207)
Reason: Standardizing more of this meta tag family, will have part two since uvas should not be for the unavailable tag.
uvas was aliased to unavailable at source 2 years ago in topic #33944, I think its usage has gotten around enough now that it should stay where it is
ucas and ucap?
uncensored_version_at_source
uncensored_version_at_paywall
dba_afish said:
ucas and ucap?
uncensored_version_at_source
uncensored_version_at_paywall
I'm capable of reading lmao
But that's at odds for not only using the first letter of each word like every other source/paywall abbreviation alias
donovan_dmc said:
uvas was aliased to unavailable at source 2 years ago in topic #33944, I think its usage has gotten around enough now that it should stay where it is
I wasn't planning on leaving it with nothing, it would just get uas instead
Edit: Actually no, after double-checking what I was planning, it would not get uas (not just because it already has an alias) because if you type "una" unavailable_at_source instantly appears as the top autocomplete option
I'm generally against changing shortcut aliases in such a way. uvas has been in use for 3 years now, and the people who use it are used to it meaning that one thing.
nin10dope said:
I wasn't planning on leaving it with nothing, it would just get uas instead
That isn't really the point, dba has basically stated my point:
dba_afish said:
I'm generally against changing shortcut aliases in such a way. uvas has been in use for 3 years now, and the people who use it are used to it meaning that one thing.
Shortcut aliases like this get known and get passed around, whether it be for adding to posts or searching changing existing shortcuts without a good reason is just inviting a lot of headaches
I can tell you I've definitely never fully typed out unavailable at source, I always use uvas
It would be pretty frustrating for that to suddenly go to a different tag with a different meaning for seemingly no good reason
donovan_dmc said:
That isn't really the point, dba has basically stated my point:Shortcut aliases like this get known and get passed around, whether it be for adding to posts or searching changing existing shortcuts without a good reason is just inviting a lot of headaches
I can tell you I've definitely never fully typed out unavailable at source, I always use uvas
It would be pretty frustrating for that to suddenly go to a different tag with a different meaning for seemingly no good reason
That's fair. I removed that part out but maybe it would just be better to reject this BUR and make a new alias request explicitly for the uvap