The tag implication #68405 canine_vulva -> plump_labia has been rejected.

Reason: Both of these overlap heavily, I haven't seen many posts tagged with canine_vulva that wouldn't also have plump_labia

EDIT: The tag implication canine_vulva -> plump_labia (forum #458296) has been rejected by @spe.

It's not true enough to warrant an implication:
post #5648528post #5581425
Especially when people want to be realistic with foxes and canids that aren't in heat.

yeah no this is a mistake imo. Plump does NOT sell what a canine vulva is on its own. That'd be like lumping Canine Penis in with Equine Penis because "both are shaped different and tagged penis"

The tag implication canine_vulva -> plump_labia (forum #458296) has been rejected by @spe.