The bulk update request #11588 is pending approval.

create implication unable_to_cum (100) -> orgasm_denial (3955)

Reason: topic #45237 brought up the idea of aliasing these, but it was strongly opposed. If the tag is to be kept, this is a logical implication.

being unable to cum doesn't automatically mean orgasm_denial.

sometimes you just can't cum. while orgasm denial requires the orgasm to be denied.

manitka said:
sometimes you just can't cum

:y

manitka said:
sometimes you just can't cum. while orgasm denial requires the orgasm to be denied.

Being unable to cum is literally the orgasm being denied, though. It's the same fetish.

beholding said:
Being unable to cum is literally the orgasm being denied, though. It's the same fetish.

Similar, not the same

nin10dope said:
Similar, not the same

Okay, what is the difference?

beholding said:
Okay, what is the difference?

Orgasm denial is when an orgasm is prevented by an external source, rather than merely the inability to orgasm.

beholding said:
Okay, what is the difference?

The difference is ability vs circumstance

watsit said:
Orgasm denial is when an orgasm is prevented by an external source, rather than merely the inability to orgasm.

^

exactly this.

Being unable to cum (be it from exhaustion, medication, etc) is entirely different then being unable to cum because a partner removes stimuli, the character themselves removes the stimulus, or through other means of stopping it.

I agree with the others. Anorgasmia and orgasm denial are different things with different niches, and I think they're different enough that an implication doesn't really work.