The tag implication #67907 intersex_pride_colors -> pride_colors has been approved.

Reason: post #5628600

While some people might better recognize the purple ring and yellow background from the Intersex-Inclusive Pride Flag, it is also a pride flag by itself.
It's also the only pride flag representing people under the LGBTQIA+ acronym that doesn't have an implication to pride_colors, yet.

Alternatively there is this option:

topic #38931
Where instead it's part of a BUR listing it as subculture_pride_colors instead.

EDIT: The tag implication intersex_pride_colors -> pride_colors (forum #454900) has been approved by @spe.

I'd hesitate to consider intersex as a subculture, considering it's something you're born as. It's kinda like if you considered people with green eyes a subculture. I think having it imply pride_colors is a much more appropriate option.

munchmallow-frosty said:
I'd hesitate to consider intersex as a subculture, considering it's something you're born as. It's kinda like if you considered people with green eyes a subculture. I think having it imply pride_colors is a much more appropriate option.

I agree. I just threw it in there since it deals with the same tag.

I probably should also have mentioned that this implication was previously rejected when it was part of a BUR with more controversial pride flags (forum #335145). I just hope dealing with this flag alone proves less controversial.

I'm honestly surprised it took this long for somebody to suggest this implication, but maybe my judgement is a bit skewed.

The tag implication intersex_pride_colors -> pride_colors (forum #454900) has been approved by @spe.