The tag implication #67832 plushie_humping -> plushie has been rejected.

Reason: plushie

EDIT: The tag implication humping_plushie -> plushie (forum #454261) has been rejected by @spe.

The bulk update request #11381 has been rejected.

create implication humping_plushie (2) -> plushophilia (2563)
create implication humping_plushie (2) -> masturbation (171657)

Reason: Plushie.

Note: Plushophilia already implies plushie.

EDIT: The bulk update request #11381 (forum #454267) has been rejected by @CrocoGator.

I wonder if humping_plushie should be renamed plushie_humping, to fit the same style as pillow_humping.

watsit said:
I wonder if humping_plushie should be renamed plushie_humping, to fit the same style as pillow_humping.

This makes sense.

I guess it should also imply grinding and masturbation?

spe said:
This makes sense.

I guess it should also imply grinding and masturbation?

the humping tags are split between *_humping and humping_*. It probably should be one way or the other for consistency. I'm not sure what constitutes grinding here ^{(even though I was the one to originally suggest pillow_humping -> grinding)}. If a character is penetrating a plushie with a penetrable_sex_toy inside:
post #4567466
is that humping_plushie, and is it grinding? If the answer to those two questions are the same, then implying grinding is probably fine.

crocogator said:
The bulk update request #11381 is pending approval.

create implication humping_plushie (74) -> plushophilia (2524)
create implication humping_plushie (74) -> masturbation (171168)

Reason: Plushie.

Note: Plushophilia already implies plushie.

Good idea, let's go for it.

crocogator said:
the humping tags are split between *_humping and humping_*. It probably should be one way or the other for consistency. I'm not sure what constitutes grinding here ^{(even though I was the one to originally suggest pillow_humping -> grinding)}. If a character is penetrating a plushie with a penetrable_sex_toy inside:
post #4567466
is that humping_plushie, and is it grinding? If the answer to those two questions are the same, then implying grinding is probably fine.

I feel like "humping plushie" is sort of inherently non-penetrative, at least according to all other uses of "humping" in tags.

crocogator said:
the humping tags are split between *_humping and humping_*. It probably should be one way or the other for consistency. I'm not sure what constitutes grinding here ^{(even though I was the one to originally suggest pillow_humping -> grinding)}. If a character is penetrating a plushie with a penetrable_sex_toy inside:
post #4567466
is that humping_plushie, and is it grinding? If the answer to those two questions are the same, then implying grinding is probably fine.

That one's just masturbating with a "penetrable sex toy" that has a plushie skin over it

spe said:
I feel like "humping plushie" is sort of inherently non-penetrative, at least according to all other uses of "humping" in tags.

nin10dope said:
That one's just masturbating with a "penetrable sex toy" that has a plushie skin over it

Alright, I guess humping_plushie or plushie_humping can imply grinding then. But first... As I've previously mentioned, humping_* vs. *_humping is split:

It sounds like people prefer *_humping, so I should create a new BUR to rename it to plushie_humping?

I think *_humping is better for sexual relief, going the road of dry_humping

The bulk update request #11404 is active.

Reason: Naming standardization and plushie_humping implications.
air_humping is already aliased to pelvic_thrust, so humping_air should be too.
Blocking transitive: topic #46179 "Tag alias: leg_humping -> humping_leg", which argues for humping_* instead.

Follow up:

alias humping_belly -> belly_humping
alias belly_hump -> belly_humping

EDIT: The bulk update request #11404 (forum #454704) has been approved by @spe.

The tag implication humping_plushie -> plushie (forum #454261) has been rejected by @spe.

The bulk update request #11404 (forum #454704) has been approved by @spe.

The bulk update request #11381 (forum #454267) has been rejected by @CrocoGator.

The bulk update request #11409 is active.

create alias humping_belly (5) -> belly_humping (303)
create alias belly_hump (0) -> belly_humping (303)

Reason: Follow up.

EDIT: The bulk update request #11409 (forum #454866) has been approved by @spe.

what about living_plushie characters? the general userbase seem to include them when tagging stuff with plushophilia (even if, to me personally, that feels really wrong).

should this tag not apply to characters humping them? should we make a decision that plushophilia shouldn't apply either?

EDIT: because stuff like post #5056958 is getting masturbation implied.

The bulk update request #11409 (forum #454866) has been approved by @spe.

dba_afish said:
what about living_plushie characters? the general userbase seem to include them when tagging stuff with plushophilia (even if, to me personally, that feels really wrong).

should this tag not apply to characters humping them? should we make a decision that plushophilia shouldn't apply either?

EDIT: because stuff like post #5056958 is getting masturbation implied.

should exclude animate plushies, I think, but plushophilia still makes sense.