Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: humping_plushie -> plushie

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

spe said:
This makes sense.

I guess it should also imply grinding and masturbation?

the humping tags are split between *_humping and humping_*. It probably should be one way or the other for consistency. I'm not sure what constitutes grinding here (even though I was the one to originally suggest pillow_humping -> grinding). If a character is penetrating a plushie with a penetrable_sex_toy inside:
post #4567466
is that humping_plushie, and is it grinding? If the answer to those two questions are the same, then implying grinding is probably fine.

crocogator said:
The bulk update request #11381 is pending approval.

create implication humping_plushie (74) -> plushophilia (2524)
create implication humping_plushie (74) -> masturbation (171168)

Reason: Plushie.

Note: Plushophilia already implies plushie.

Good idea, let's go for it.

spe

Admin

crocogator said:
the humping tags are split between *_humping and humping_*. It probably should be one way or the other for consistency. I'm not sure what constitutes grinding here (even though I was the one to originally suggest pillow_humping -> grinding). If a character is penetrating a plushie with a penetrable_sex_toy inside:
post #4567466
is that humping_plushie, and is it grinding? If the answer to those two questions are the same, then implying grinding is probably fine.

I feel like "humping plushie" is sort of inherently non-penetrative, at least according to all other uses of "humping" in tags.

crocogator said:
the humping tags are split between *_humping and humping_*. It probably should be one way or the other for consistency. I'm not sure what constitutes grinding here (even though I was the one to originally suggest pillow_humping -> grinding). If a character is penetrating a plushie with a penetrable_sex_toy inside:
post #4567466
is that humping_plushie, and is it grinding? If the answer to those two questions are the same, then implying grinding is probably fine.

That one's just masturbating with a "penetrable sex toy" that has a plushie skin over it

spe said:
I feel like "humping plushie" is sort of inherently non-penetrative, at least according to all other uses of "humping" in tags.

nin10dope said:
That one's just masturbating with a "penetrable sex toy" that has a plushie skin over it

Alright, I guess humping_plushie or plushie_humping can imply grinding then. But first... As I've previously mentioned, humping_* vs. *_humping is split:

current *humping* tags with at least 2 posts

bold italics = tags that have a duplicate with the other naming convention

*_humping
1296 ? pillow_humping
822 ? dry_humping
137 ? table_humping
125 ? diaper_humping
88 ? leg_humping
62 ? object_humping
56 ? aggressive_humping
32 ? tail_humping
27 ? plush_humping
11 ? female_humping
2 ? assisted_humping
2 ? foot_humping

humping_*
307 ? humping_belly
98 ? humping_toy
95 ? humping_diaper
88 ? humping_leg
75 ? humping_plushie
46 ? humping_air
44 ? humping_own_belly
42 ? humping_object
8 ? humping_hand
7 ? humping_furniture
6 ? humping_balloon
5 ? humping_food
4 ? humping_while_knotted
3 ? humping_floor
2 ? humping_sofa
2 ? humping_foot
2 ? humping_navel
2 ? humping_bed

Apparently, humping itself is also a tag.

It sounds like people prefer *_humping, so I should create a new BUR to rename it to plushie_humping?

Updated

I think *_humping is better for sexual relief, going the road of dry_humping

The bulk update request #11404 is active.

create implication plushie_humping (97) -> plushophilia (2562)
create implication plushie_humping (97) -> grinding (8768)
create implication plushie_humping (97) -> masturbation (171592)
remove alias belly_humping (303) -> humping_belly (5)
remove alias belly_hump (0) -> humping_belly (5)
create alias humping_toy (5) -> toy_humping (93)
create alias humping_diaper (3) -> diaper_humping (190)
create alias humping_leg (6) -> leg_humping (162)
create alias humping_plushie (2) -> plushie_humping (97)
create alias plush_humping (3) -> plushie_humping (97)
create alias humping_air (2) -> pelvic_thrust (273)
create alias humping_object (7) -> object_humping (99)
create alias humping_hand (2) -> hand_humping (6)
create alias humping_furniture (2) -> furniture_humping (7)
create alias humping_balloon (2) -> balloon_humping (4)
create alias humping_food (5) -> food_humping (0)
create alias humping_floor (1) -> floor_humping (2)
create alias humping_sofa (1) -> sofa_humping (1)
create alias humping_foot (2) -> foot_humping (2)
create alias humping_navel (2) -> navel_humping (0)
create alias humping_bed (2) -> bed_humping (0)

Reason: Naming standardization and plushie_humping implications.
air_humping is already aliased to pelvic_thrust, so humping_air should be too.
Blocking transitive: topic #46179 "Tag alias: leg_humping -> humping_leg", which argues for humping_* instead.

Follow up:

alias humping_belly -> belly_humping
alias belly_hump -> belly_humping

EDIT: The bulk update request #11404 (forum #454704) has been approved by @spe.

Updated by auto moderator

what about living_plushie characters? the general userbase seem to include them when tagging stuff with plushophilia (even if, to me personally, that feels really wrong).

should this tag not apply to characters humping them? should we make a decision that plushophilia shouldn't apply either?

EDIT: because stuff like post #5056958 is getting masturbation implied.

Updated

spe

Admin

dba_afish said:
what about living_plushie characters? the general userbase seem to include them when tagging stuff with plushophilia (even if, to me personally, that feels really wrong).

should this tag not apply to characters humping them? should we make a decision that plushophilia shouldn't apply either?

EDIT: because stuff like post #5056958 is getting masturbation implied.

plushie_humping

should exclude animate plushies, I think, but plushophilia still makes sense.