The tag alias #76967 bigsub -> small_dom_big_sub is pending approval.

Reason: Self explanatory

I can see that a few posts in bigsub feature characters who are just physically large and being "submissive" (not applicable in the tagging sense). Might want to fix those before accepting the change.
I was going to suggest realiasing related tags (i.e., bigsub, big_sub, small_dom, etc.) to either dominant or submissive, but I don't believe that is how the two tags are supposed to be used (see topic #56095).

thegreatwolfgang said:
I can see that a few posts in bigsub feature characters who are just physically large and being "submissive" (not applicable in the tagging sense). Might want to fix those before accepting the change.
I was going to suggest realiasing related tags (i.e., bigsub, big_sub, small_dom, etc.) to either dominant or submissive, but I don't believe that is how the two tags are supposed to be used (see topic #56095).

I did discover this tag when doing Beholding's tag project for big_bottom cleaning. Pun fully intended
All of the other big_sub/small_dom esque tags are already aliased to the long versions small_dom_big_sub / big_dom_small_sub
So this one felt like an outlier that just got missed

thegreatwolfgang said:
(see topic #56095).

Oh hey, I was there 0:

thegreatwolfgang said:
I can see that a few posts in bigsub feature characters who are just physically large and being "submissive" (not applicable in the tagging sense). Might want to fix those before accepting the change.

That's a problem all throughout the dom/sub tags. Characters that appear or are said to have a dominant or submissive personality, along with mere penetrative sex being tagged with dom/sub tags, without any domination/submission actually occurring.

People are conflating dom/sub with top/bottom