The bulk update request #11292 is pending approval.

create implication mutual_cunnilingus (184) -> mutual_oral (974)
create implication mutual_cunnilingus (184) -> cunnilingus (37546)

Reason: Follow-up to topic #57247

Add missing implications from mutual_cunnilingus to mutual_oral and cunnilingus. For similar implications, see mutual_fellatio and mutual_rimming.

The following aliases are not included pending discussion about whether they should be treated like collaborative_rimming (where double_rimming is deemed an alias) or collaborative_fellatio (where double_fellatio is deemed a unique, separate act):

alias double_cunnilingus -> collaborative_cunnilingus
alias triple_cunnilingus -> collaborative_cunnilingus

The above are tagged differently on different posts: https://e621.net/posts?tags=%7Edouble_cunnilingus+%7Etriple_cunnilingus