The bulk update request #11202 has been rejected.

create implication knot_in_sheath (2090) -> knotted_penis (26296)
create implication knot_in_mouth (136) -> knotted_penis (26296)
create implication knot_in_ass (88) -> knotted_penis (26296)

Reason: knotted penis

EDIT: The bulk update request #11202 (forum #450400) has been rejected by @romanicyte2.

Makes me want to find the post where it's a tentacle with a knot.
Or one of those weird images that's body horror where the penis is just replaced with a kind of tower of testicles.

... these forums are bringing out my inner contrarian.

romanicyte2 said:
create implication knot_in_sheath (2017) -> knotted_penis (20987)
create implication knot_in_mouth (123) -> knotted_penis (20987)
create implication knot_in_ass (34) -> knotted_penis (20987)

Reason: knotted penis

And casually ignoring every other knots, such as knotted_dildo, knotted_tentacle, etc.

One of the problems with shoving knots into orifices is that said orifice could hide the knot from view; e.g., knot_bulge.
The same reason as why we don't tag penis on penis_in_mouth, penis_in_ass, etc.

I wouldn't be opposed, however, if they all simply implied knot.

thegreatwolfgang said:
One of the problems with shoving knots into orifices is that said orifice could hide the knot from view; e.g., knot_bulge.
The same reason as why we don't tag penis on penis_in_mouth, penis_in_ass, etc.

This would be true of knot_in_mouth and knot_in_ass, at least. But knot_in_sheath used to imply knot, and I feel that situation is closer to erection_under_clothing. I don't know why that implication was removed, since unlike the former two, you have to be able to see the knot outline in the sheath to be able to tag it, not simply see a canine penis tip poking out of the sheath and assume the knot is inside (since the knot may not be formed, and typically isn't if it's not fully erect and about to orgasm).

thegreatwolfgang said:
And casually ignoring every other knots, such as knotted_dildo, knotted_tentacle, etc.

Well, the tags are clearly not meant for knotted dildos (like, the knot of knotted dildo in a sheath?), but i didn't think about knotted tentacles, probably because that is a rare thing to exist.

thegreatwolfgang said:
One of the problems with shoving knots into orifices is that said orifice could hide the knot from view; e.g., knot_bulge.
The same reason as why we don't tag penis on penis_in_mouth, penis_in_ass, etc.

Still ignoring the existence of knotted tentacles, if something is tagged, for example, knot in ass, doesn't that imply that there is enough evidence that there is a knot inside that ass and therefore that penis inside that ass has a knot, therefore knotted penis applies? Because otherwise knot in ass wouldn't be valid anyway.

Knot being allowed for things like tentacles and dildos has caused more problems than solved, perhaps one solution could be move those things to some kind of 'non-penile knot' tag or something.

romanicyte2 said:
Well, the tags are clearly not meant for knotted dildos (like, the knot of knotted dildo in a sheath?), but i didn't think about knotted tentacles, probably because that is a rare thing to exist.

That's because we expanded the definition of knot on topic #44531 to include everything knot related (pun). That means knotted_penis, knotted_dildo, knotted_tentacles, and such.
The wikis for most knot_* tags haven't been edited yet to explicitly mention this expansion of knots.

I don't see why we can't have a knotted dildo or tentacle docking inside a sheath.

Even if we kept knot_in_sheath for its original intended purpose, you could have a swollen knot be completely hidden inside the sheath with no visible penis_tip.
Thus, the implication of knotted_penis and subsequently penis is not valid.

Still ignoring the existence of knotted tentacles, if something is tagged, for example, knot in ass, doesn't that imply that there is enough evidence that there is a knot inside that ass and therefore that penis inside that ass has a knot, therefore knotted penis applies? Because otherwise knot in ass wouldn't be valid anyway.

If you mean "knot" as in the current definition of knot, then yes.
If you mean "knot" as in knotted_penis, then no.

As mentioned before, this is the very same reason penis_in_ass, etc. does not imply penis.
For knotted_penis to apply, you'd need to visually see part of said penis.

AFAIK, if said penis is completely obscured by clothing (i.e., penis_outline & knot_outline) or by the penetrated character (i.e., abdominal_bulge & knot_bulge), you do not tag it as a penis but rather as a genital_outline or bulge.
If any part of the knot/penis is visible to the naked eye (e.g., knot_root, internal), then you can tag it as knotted_penis.

Knot being allowed for things like tentacles and dildos has caused more problems than solved, perhaps one solution could be move those things to some kind of 'non-penile knot' tag or something.

Problem where? You are supposed to use knotted_penis for when you see that penis.
Even before we expanded the definition, implying knot to knot_in_* would still not work for the reasons I mentioned before.

thegreatwolfgang said:
I don't see why we can't have a knotted dildo or tentacle docking inside a sheath.

I think that's a distinct enough scenario from a knotted penis in its own sheath with a visible knot outline/bulge, and shouldn't be kept under the same tag as another character or dildo knotting their sheath.

thegreatwolfgang said:
Even if we kept knot_in_sheath for its original intended purpose, you could have a swollen knot be completely hidden inside the sheath with no visible penis_tip.
Thus, the implication of knotted_penis and subsequently penis is not valid.

As mentioned before, this is the very same reason penis_in_ass, etc. does not imply penis.
For knotted_penis to apply, you'd need to visually see part of said penis.

Meh, I get it, but still a bit weird IMO. Thank you, everyone, for your inputs.

The bulk update request #11202 (forum #450400) has been rejected by @romanicyte2.