I noticed that a few of my uploads have been removed during the past hour for featuring "young human-like" characters when said characters hardly look humanoid at all. did my uploads get false flagged or was it a staff decision?

currently waiting for a response regarding this issue.

satayvendor said:
I noticed that a few of my uploads have been removed during the past hour for featuring "young human-like" characters when said characters hardly look humanoid at all. did my uploads get false flagged or was it a staff decision?

currently waiting for a response regarding this issue.

One I'm fairly certain this is something you should have kept in DMs with the mod in question, NotMeNotYou. I think there's a guideline about it.

Two, I think that the head admin deleted them because they have humanoids.
They do not have humans in them, but they are so close to looking human that they may as well be human characters.

Yes I did look at the posts in question, and those would not hold up as not human art against a jury. Not even if my observant eyes were the eyes of everyone on said jury.

satayvendor said:
I noticed that a few of my uploads have been removed during the past hour for featuring "young human-like" characters when said characters hardly look humanoid at all. did my uploads get false flagged or was it a staff decision?

currently waiting for a response regarding this issue.

All flags are manually reviewed by staff before deletion, so yes. They believed your artworks featured what we defined visually as "young human-like", see topic #45501 for an expanded definition.

In situations such as this where you disagree with a deletion, you are encouraged to ask the mod in question about their reasons and present your counterargument as to why it isn't the case.
However, judging by who deleted your posts, you are probably not going to get it reverted since it was deleted by the head admin themselves, whom personally oversaw the mass purging of "young human-like" content from the site.

5503425 doesn't look human-like to me given the ears but "young explicit" content that's anywhere close to human tends to get weaned off the site. As for those others you posted...

You might want to move on to ATF for arguably human-looking cub content. Now that it's been deleted by the head admin you'll have to elevate this issue to God.

oneohthrix said:
5503425 doesn't look human-like to me given the ears but "young explicit" content that's anywhere close to human tends to get weaned off the site.

In this context, "human-like" doesn't mean "human for the purposes of being relevant to furries", but rather "enough like a human that certain people e6 relies on can get into hot water". The young-human purge isn't something e6 wanted to do, but were required to because of outside forces, so doesn't really follow the usual categorization the site otherwise uses.