Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #67506 mermonkey -> bloons_tower_defense has been rejected.
Reason: Mermonkey is a character from BTD6.
If several people disagree with this "merfolk" tag implicating BTD, then I'll reject this and make a BUR to alias mermonkey to mermonkey_(bloons) and implicate BTD for that.
EDIT: The tag implication mermonkey -> bloons_tower_defense (forum #450385) has been rejected by @Peskeon.
Updated by auto moderator
Currently the usage seems fine, but I do wonder if mermonkey_(bloons) might be better future-proofing from any mistags.
Although, it doesn't seem like there's many mer* tags unlike the sheer amount of were* tags that exist. Maybe it's fine?
I think adding _(bloons) to it is best. It makes it clear that it's a character/species(?) from Bloons at first glance and not an invalid tag. It also makes it obvious what tag is adding the Bloons copyright tag if it IS applied incorrectly.
The tag implication mermonkey -> bloons_tower_defense (forum #450385) has been rejected by @Peskeon.
The bulk update request #11200 is pending approval.
create alias mermonkey (19) -> mermonkey_(bloons) (0)
create implication mermonkey_(bloons) (0) -> bloons_tower_defense (1097)
Reason: The people have spoken.
