Topic: [APPROVED] Sneaker colors

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

HardShirt

Member

The bulk update request #11176 is active.

create implication green_sneakers (49) -> green_shoes (853)
create implication yellow_sneakers (55) -> yellow_shoes (823)
create implication grey_sneakers (24) -> grey_shoes (733)
create implication tan_sneakers (3) -> tan_shoes (98)
create implication brown_sneakers (0) -> brown_shoes (2500)
create implication white_sneakers (317) -> white_shoes (3136)
create implication blue_sneakers (141) -> blue_shoes (1733)
create implication orange_sneakers (28) -> orange_shoes (548)
create implication red_sneakers (342) -> red_shoes (4474)
create implication pink_sneakers (84) -> pink_shoes (1142)
create implication pink_sneakers (84) -> pink_shoes (1142)
create implication teal_sneakers (2) -> teal_shoes (27)
create implication black_sneakers (213) -> black_shoes (5734)
create implication green_sneakers (49) -> sneakers (11639)
create implication teal_sneakers (2) -> sneakers (11639)
create implication yellow_sneakers (55) -> sneakers (11639)
create implication grey_sneakers (24) -> sneakers (11639)
create implication tan_sneakers (3) -> sneakers (11639)
create implication brown_sneakers (0) -> sneakers (11639)
create implication white_sneakers (317) -> sneakers (11639)
create implication blue_sneakers (141) -> sneakers (11639)
create implication orange_sneakers (28) -> sneakers (11639)
create implication red_sneakers (342) -> sneakers (11639)
create implication pink_sneakers (84) -> sneakers (11639)
create implication pink_sneakers (84) -> sneakers (11639)

Reason: There are colors/sneaker type tags that don't imply sneakers. I'll just start some here.

EDIT: The bulk update request #11176 (forum #450121) has been approved by @spe.

Updated by auto moderator

HardShirt

Member

The bulk update request #11178 is pending approval.

create implication black_sneakers (213) -> sneakers (11639)
create implication torn_sneakers (9) -> sneakers (11639)
create implication torn_sneakers (9) -> torn_footwear (813)
create implication toeless_sneakers (8) -> toeless_footwear (9181)
create implication toeless_sneakers (8) -> toeless_shoes (542)
create alias open_toe_sneakers (7) -> toeless_sneakers (8)
create alias open_toed_sneakers (0) -> toeless_sneakers (8)
create implication print_sneakers (2) -> print_footwear (83)
create implication print_sneakers (2) -> sneakers (11639)
create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> sneakers (11639)
create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> gistening_footwear (0)
create implication platform_sneakers (1) -> platform_shoes (192)
create implication platform_sneakers (1) -> sneakers (11639)
create implication two_tone_sneakers (120) -> two_tone_shoes (990)
create implication two_tone_sneakers (120) -> multicolored_sneakers (51)
create implication multicolored_sneakers (51) -> multicolored_shoes (1431)
create implication two_tone_sneakers (120) -> sneakers (11639)
create implication knee_sneakers (14) -> sneakers (11639)
create implication discarded_sneakers (3) -> sneakers (11639)
create implication discarded_sneakers (3) -> discarded_footwear (155)
create implication purple_sneakers (36) -> purple_shoes (720)
create implication purple_sneakers (36) -> purple_shoes (720)

Reason: Continuation of previous BUR request.

NOTE: I put the wrong forum topic

spe

Admin

A few issues with the second one.

  • create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> sneakers (11057)
  • create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> gistening_footwear (0)

These are weird. Only two posts and one of them doesn’t even look very glistening. Seems like a pointless tag. But if it is valid, shouldn’t it imply glistening_shoes instead? Also, gistening_footwear is a typo.

  • create implication torn_sneakers (8) -> torn_footwear (805)

Why not torn_shoes?

  • create implication toeless_sneakers (8) -> toeless_footwear (9127)
  • create implication toeless_sneakers (8) -> toeless_shoes (533)

These are redundant.

HardShirt

Member

spe said:
A few issues with the second one.

  • create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> sneakers (11057)
  • create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> gistening_footwear (0)

These are weird. Only two posts and one of them doesn’t even look very glistening. Seems like a pointless tag. But if it is valid, shouldn’t it imply glistening_shoes instead? Also, gistening_footwear is a typo.

  • create implication torn_sneakers (8) -> torn_footwear (805)

Why not torn_shoes?

  • create implication toeless_sneakers (8) -> toeless_footwear (9127)
  • create implication toeless_sneakers (8) -> toeless_shoes (533)

These are redundant.

Uhm...I can look through this again

HardShirt

Member

The bulk update request #11965 is pending approval.

remove implication torn_sneakers (9) -> torn_footwear (813) # missing
create implication torn_sneakers (9) -> torn_shoes (684)
create implication torn_shoes (684) -> torn_footwear (813)
remove implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> glistening_footwear (495) # missing
create implication glistening_sneakers (2) -> glistening_shoes (170)
create implication glistening_shoes (170) -> glistening_footwear (495) # duplicate of implication #36801
remove implication torn_sneakers (9) -> torn_footwear (813) # missing
create implication torn_sneakers (9) -> torn_shoes (684)
create implication torn_shoes (684) -> torn_footwear (813)

Reason: A recommended correction from spe.

Alien Fluff

Janitor

Shouldn't there be aliases made for all these to incorporate the British English word for the shoes (i.e. trainers)?