Right now oral_orgasm and anal_orgasm imply hands-free. This means that it contains posts with fingering, fisting, and toying_self, and posts where hands are definitely touching genitals. Are these really valid uses of hands-free?
post #5244743post #5289691post #4308585

Hands-free also implies ejaculation which feels wrong.
post #5424704post #5146077

Am I missing something or are these straight-up bad implications?

I thought it was a male having an orgasm without touching the genitalia through something like prostate stimulation

It should imply anal penetration with that thought process

fliphook said:
I thought it was a male having an orgasm without touching the genitalia through something like prostate stimulation

Correct. anal_orgasm applies when a character reaches orgasm through anal stimulation alone (including the prostate), not simply anal+orgasm. Similar for oral_orgasm being an orgasm through oral stimulation alone (their own mouth being stimulated, not their penis being stimulated by another's mouth). There's also spontaneous_ejaculation where a character reaches orgasm without any apparent sexual stimulation.

fliphook said:
It should imply anal penetration with that thought process

That wouldn't work if it's a result of being rimmed.

fliphook said:
I thought it was a male having an orgasm without touching the genitalia through something like prostate stimulation

It should imply anal penetration with that thought process

It's also implied to oral_orgasm so it shouldn't imply anal_penetration.
Currently it's implied to anal_orgasm which means that images where the penis is being touched/held/positioned are getting hands-free slapped on them.

regsmutt said:
Currently it's implied to anal_orgasm which means that images where the penis is being touched/held/positioned are getting hands-free slapped on them.

What's implied to anal_orgasm? If the penis is being touched/held/etc (receiving any kind of direct stimulation), then neither anal_orgasm or hands-free should be tagged as it wouldn't be an orgasm from only anal stimulation.

watsit said:
What's implied to anal_orgasm? If the penis is being touched/held/etc (receiving any kind of direct stimulation), then neither anal_orgasm or hands-free should be tagged as it wouldn't be an orgasm from only anal stimulation.

Anal_orgasm implies hands-free.

I don't agree that anal_orgasm is incompatible with the penis being touched. It can be drawn and animated in ways that suggest it's being held, positioned, or supported rather than being rubbed, particularly in animation.
post #4734158

If anal_orgasm included posts where the penis was being "held, positioned, or supported" it'd be too complicated with weird edge cases. I think the hands-free implication for both oral/anal_orgasm works. It's sensible and simpler

regsmutt said:
I don't agree that anal_orgasm is incompatible with the penis being touched. It can be drawn and animated in ways that suggest it's being held, positioned, or supported rather than being rubbed, particularly in animation.
post #4734158

Touching is a form of (light) stimulation, it doesn't have to be all-out rubbing to count.