The bulk update request #11131 is pending approval.

create implication mismatched_animal_genitalia (586) -> mismatched_genitalia (6423)
create implication mismatched_humanoid_genitalia (1) -> mismatched_genitalia (6423)
create implication mismatched_animal_penis (5400) -> mismatched_animal_genitalia (586)
create implication mismatched_humanoid_penis (440) -> mismatched_humanoid_genitalia (1)
create implication mismatched_animal_pussy (74) -> mismatched_animal_genitalia (586)
create implication mismatched_humanoid_pussy (25) -> mismatched_humanoid_genitalia (1)
create implication mismatched_penis (6131) -> penis (1672423)
create implication mismatched_pussy (147) -> pussy (956823)
create implication mismatched_genitalia (6423) -> genitals (2428478)
create implication mismatched_animal_genitalia (586) -> animal_genitalia (520482)
create alias incorrect_humanoid_genitalia (0) -> mismatched_humanoid_genitalia (1)

Reason: mismatched_animal_genitalia exists on its own with >500 posts, so it seems like a good idea to properly establish this tree

BTR BUR below is required for this:

alias incorrect_animal_genitalia -> mismatched_animal_genitalia

alternatively if we don't want these tags:

alias mismatched_animal_genitalia -> mismatched_genitalia
alias mismatched_humanoid_genitalia -> mismatched_genitalia
alias incorrect_humanoid_genitalia -> mismatched_genitalia

The bulk update request #11134 is pending approval.

remove alias incorrect_animal_genitalia (2) -> mismatched_genitalia (6423)

Reason: BTR for alias incorrect_animal_genitalia -> mismatched_animal_genitalia

I think that the mismatched_humanoid_* tags should be aliased away. It's just 'anthro character with humanoid genitals.' See also topic #55391

regsmutt said:
I think that the mismatched_humanoid_* tags should be aliased away. It's just 'anthro character with humanoid genitals.' See also topic #55391

we do already have humanoid_genitalia_on_anthro aliased away via topic #46842, for a while prior to that it was cat invalid.

regsmutt said:
I think that the mismatched_humanoid_* tags should be aliased away. It's just 'anthro character with humanoid genitals.' See also topic #55391

I'd have no issue with that, I'm just using the tags already existing with implications as precedent
They are woefully underused, mismatched_humanoid_penis has just north of 400 posts when it should likely be several hundred thousands, if not millions

donovan_dmc said:
I'd have no issue with that, I'm just using the tags already existing with implications as precedent
They are woefully underused, mismatched_humanoid_penis has just north of 400 posts when it should likely be several hundred thousands, if not millions

Looking at the use of mismatched_humanoid_pussy it looks like it's mostly one person a few years ago who used it with six uses since then. So it probably won't be missed if it got aliased away.

I’m gonna vote for keeping the more verbose tag set for the sake of blacklisting.

aversioncapacitor' said:
Things get weird when you have cats with rockets though.

Even weirder when you get fictional species, like charr. We already have tags like anatomically_correct_genitalia, which isn't supposed to apply to fictional species, and presumably mismatched_genitalia would follow the same rules. A cat-like pokemon, for example, can have a canine or horse penis and be neither anatomically_correct_genitalia or mismatched_genitalia; as a fictional species, there's no saying what is "correct" or "mismatched" for them, after all (for all we know, all non-breedable pokemon are null, and all breedable pokemon have a cloaca, since they spawn eggs). Unless Nintendo or TPC comes out and says what kind of genitalia various pokemon have, which will never happen. Then again, I'm not a fan of the anatomically_correct_* tags since many people just use it to mean animal_genitalia, and having both anatomically_correct_genitalia and mismatched_genitalia seems redundant (if it's not one, it must be the other, if either can be tagged).

aversioncapacitor' said:
I’m gonna vote for keeping the more verbose tag set for the sake of blacklisting.

Actually, no. The kind of people I would think of would just blacklist animal_genitalia, I’m pretty sure.
Otherwise the verbose tags sound like they’d complicate post creation.There is still the ability to blacklist feral -mismatched_genitalia so the minimised tag set does make sense.Things get weird when you have cats with rockets though. Could trigger a select few so maybe mismatched animal genitalia gets to stay.

Mismatched_animal_genitalia/pussy/penis is a bit more valid because a) it's still animal genitals b) it's something people look for/want to blacklist and c) the alternative is tags like equine_pussy_on_canine which suck and will be a nightmare.
With human genitals it's weird to call a humanoid penis on a (mostly) humanoid-but-fur-covered body 'mismatched.' There's also already tags for humanoid genitals that can be used to exclude/search for characters with them AND there's humanoid_genitalia/penis/pussy_on_feral tags. They're just kind of redundant. Maybe humanoid_genitalia_on_feral tags should imply mismatched_genitalia, but that's about it.