The tag alias #76286 side_cut -> sidecut has been approved.

Reason: Refers to the same hairstyle.

EDIT: The tag alias side_cut -> sidecut (forum #447609) has been approved by @spe.

I'm saying Nay because undercut is used and not under_cut

In fact I think this alias request should be flipped around to fit the style of the more popular tag

nin10dope said:
I'm saying Nay because undercut is used and not under_cut

In fact I think this alias request should be flipped around to fit the style of the more popular tag

The alias request is because they're trying to alias to the actual spelling of the hairstyle, which for some reason is not the more commonly used one.

I'm going to have to say to flip it. Apparently, it's supposed to be one word. Yes, I know it's Wiktionary, but Oxford has it only as one word, Merriam-Webster doesn't have any association with the haircut, and Dictionary .com has no idea what either version is.

Yeah the first several results from multiple differently worded searches all say that both spellings are valid and acceptable. My argument is conformity

clawstripe said:
I'm going to have to say to flip it. Apparently, it's supposed to be one word. Yes, I know it's Wiktionary, but Oxford has it only as one word, Merriam-Webster doesn't have any association with the haircut, and Dictionary .com has no idea what either version is.

This is convincing. Flipped and approved.

The tag alias side_cut -> sidecut (forum #447609) has been approved by @spe.