The tag alias #76143 male_stripper -> stripper is pending approval.

Reason: Unnecessary gendered variant

Wouldn't it be better to have a separation of who the stripper is in a given image?

nin10dope said:
Wouldn't it be better to have a separation of who the stripper is in a given image?

We try to limit the amount of combinatory tags we have, otherwise we would have an infinite explosion of [gender]_[thing].

pleaseletmein said:
We try to limit the amount of combinatory tags we have, otherwise we would have an infinite explosion of [gender]_[thing].

True
I was thinking if it was contained to professions

pleaseletmein said:
The tag alias #76143 male_stripper -> stripper is pending approval.

Reason: Unnecessary gendered variant

I agree with you 100%.
Gendered stripper is not necessary.
You'll probably get a green bar for making such necessary alias requests.

My question is what users should do if they want to search for male strippers specifically. stripper +male -female -intersex would probably work, but it'd cut out a significant amount of male stripper content too.

beholding said:
My question is what users should do if they want to search for male strippers specifically. stripper +male -female -intersex would probably work, but it'd cut out a significant amount of male stripper content too.

stripper ~( male_focus ) ~( male -f -intersex )

I mean people could start adding gigolo to those posts, since the desire for a male_stripper has its own real world term.

nin10dope said:
I mean people could start adding gigolo to those posts, since the desire for a male_stripper has its own real world term.

That's ripe for being aliased away, like whore and other similar derogatory terms

donovan_dmc said:
That's ripe for being aliased away, like whore and other similar derogatory terms

I mean it's not in use but it isn't a derogatory term.