The bulk update request #10710 has been rejected.

create alias breasts_bigger_than_head (243) -> breasts (1907729)
create alias breasts_bigger_than_torso (0) -> breasts (1907729)
create alias ass_bigger_than_head (4) -> butt (1134952)
create alias ass_bigger_than_torso (0) -> butt (1134952)

Reason: Useless, but frequent.

EDIT: The bulk update request #10710 (forum #442861) has been rejected by @munchmallow-frosty.

Should we be more specific in the alias?

breasts_bigger_than_head -> huge_breasts
breasts_bigger_than_torso -> hyper_breasts

Since that's sort of the definition of those tags.

I just wanted to be safe. I didn't want somebody using one of these tags to tag it as hyper by mistake. Though, thinking about it now, we could probably alias them to big_breasts and big_butt instead.

civil_nitrogen said:
Should we be more specific in the alias?

breasts_bigger_than_head -> huge_breasts
breasts_bigger_than_torso -> hyper_breasts

Since that's sort of the definition of those tags.

better to leave it targeting the root tag, people will have different perceptions as to what size bigger than a head or torso actually entail.

counterpoint, people who don't know the actual tag name would benefit from the tag being corrected to the closest tag when searching.

although huge_* should be the target for both, not hyper_*, hyper is quite a bit larger than what is described.

The bulk update request #10710 (forum #442861) has been rejected by @munchmallow-frosty.

The bulk update request #11356 is pending approval.

create alias breasts_bigger_than_head (243) -> huge_breasts (365688)
create alias breasts_bigger_than_torso (0) -> huge_breasts (365688)
create alias ass_bigger_than_head (4) -> huge_butt (151123)
create alias ass_bigger_than_torso (0) -> huge_butt (151123)

Reason: I'd like to try this again, but by instead aliasing to a more specific tag. They're both redundant toward huge_breasts and huge_butt, anyway.