Topic: [APPROVED] Penetration Implications

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #10697 is active.

create implication handjob_while_penetrating (2145) -> penetration (905579)
create implication handjob_while_penetrated (1084) -> penetration (905579)
create implication footjob_while_penetrating (47) -> penetration (905579)
create implication footjob_while_penetrated (97) -> penetration (905579)
create implication handjob_while_penetrating (2145) -> handjob (63223)
create implication handjob_while_penetrated (1084) -> handjob (63223)
create implication footjob_while_penetrating (47) -> footjob (18899)
create implication footjob_while_penetrated (97) -> footjob (18899)

Reason: Seems fairly self-explanatory. If there's penetration involved, it should imply the penetration tag, no?

(Please let me know if I'm doing this right)

EDIT: The bulk update request #10697 (forum #442675) has been approved by @spe.

Updated by auto moderator