The tag implication #66775 outside_masturbation -> outside has been rejected.

Reason: seems pretty obvious

EDIT: The tag implication outside_masturbation -> outside (forum #441169) has been rejected by @spe.

The same issue applies to outside_sex. The usual problem with implying inside or outside is that those tags refer to the position of the viewer/camera, not the characters. So that leads to the really pedantic question "what if the picture is inside, but you can see a character masturbating or having sex outside through a window or open door?". Though, we could also just bypass this issue by deciding that outside_masturbation and outside_sex require the picture to be outside.

crocogator said:
The same issue applies to outside_sex. The usual problem with implying inside or outside is that those tags refer to the position of the viewer/camera, not the characters. So that leads to the really pedantic question "what if the picture is inside, but you can see a character masturbating or having sex outside through a window or open door?". Though, we could also just bypass this issue by deciding that outside_masturbation and outside_sex require the picture to be outside.

If they require the picture to be outside, then they are equivalent to searching for outside sex and outside masturbation aren't they?

wandering_spaniel said:
If they require the picture to be outside, then they are equivalent to searching for outside sex and outside masturbation aren't they?

Yeah, that's a good point. It would make the tags kind of redundant, so maybe it's best to keep outside_sex/outside_masturbation as referring to the character's position and not create an implication, as we've been doing already.

(Though, it's worth noting that the rare cases of inside outside_sex and inside outside_masturbation are not very searchable, since they're mostly just mistags of penetration/cum_inside, rather than pics taking place inside. A year ago, I created the related tags inside_looking_out and its counterpart outside_looking_in, though I've not put any effort into keeping the tags up to date since then. Those tags might be a bit off-topic though, since they are about the (admittedly vaguely defined) "focus" of the picture rather than sex/masturbation)

The tag implication outside_masturbation -> outside (forum #441169) has been rejected by @spe.