The tag implication #66677 pussy_outline -> covered_pussy has been rejected.

Reason: In order for you to see the outline of a pussy in a material implies that the material covers the pussy.

EDIT: The tag implication pussy_outline -> covered_pussy (forum #440258) has been rejected by @spe.

Covered pussy already seems very vague tag to me, and this implication would make it even more vague and pointless by including fully and modestly clothed characters with sufficiently deep camel toe.

I can see the logic, but I'm not sure covered_pussy is a good tag. There's no wiki defining exactly what it means (how little coverage ceases to be "covered", should it be used in every situation where an assumed female character's crotch is in the picture but you can't see her genitals or only for characters where the hip region/crotch are exposed except the pussy, etc...)

The tag implication pussy_outline -> covered_pussy (forum #440258) has been rejected by @spe.