Topic: Pantsless implication list

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #10438 is pending approval.

create implication pantsless_male (850) -> pantsless (5967)
create implication pantsless_male (850) -> male (2754457)
create implication pantsless_female (778) -> pantsless (5967)
create implication pantsless_female (778) -> female (2774800)
create implication pantsless_anthro (1319) -> pantsless (5967)
create implication pantsless_anthro (1319) -> anthro (3673409)
create implication pantsless_intersex (1) -> pantsless (5967)
create implication pantsless_intersex (1) -> intersex (271485)
create implication pantsless_andromorph (0) -> pantsless_intersex (1)
create implication pantsless_andromorph (0) -> andromorph (26534)
create implication pantsless_gynomorph (6) -> pantsless_intersex (1)
create implication pantsless_gynomorph (6) -> gynomorph (212808)
create implication pantsless_herm (0) -> pantsless_intersex (1)
create implication pantsless_herm (0) -> herm (29576)
create implication pantsless_humanoid (32) -> pantsless (5967)
create implication pantsless_humanoid (32) -> humanoid (489008)
create implication pantsless_feral (0) -> pantsless (5967)
create implication pantsless_feral (0) -> feral (665516)
create implication pantsless_taur (0) -> pantsless (5967)
create implication pantsless_taur (0) -> taur (20284)
create implication pantsless_maleherm (0) -> pantsless_intersex (1)
create implication pantsless_maleherm (0) -> maleherm (4948)
create implication pantsless_ambiguous (0) -> pantsless (5967)
create implication pantsless_ambiguous (0) -> ambiguous_gender (345322)

Reason: Making implications for a few pantsless_* tags

If we're gonna have pantsless_[gender/form] I recommend including it for all the genders and forms

snpthecat said:
If we're gonna have pantsless_[gender/form] I recommend including it for all the genders and forms

May have missed something but I think I got mostly everything.