The tag implication #66426 chastity_device -> separation_(layout) has been rejected.

Reason: It's a huge bummer that female_chastity is getting grouped into chastity_device as a whole when most of it is male chastity. Chastity device should obviously remain a tag, but female_chastity really needs to be separated from this.

EDIT: The tag implication chastity_device -> separation_(layout) (forum #437685) has been rejected by @spe.

Okay but this implication is nonsensical and has nothing to do with your readon.

It won't allow to enter two things with chastity in From and To

blastedmutt said:
It won't allow to enter two things with chastity in From and To

That doesn't mean you can freely submit frivolous suggestions like this.
If you don't understand how implications work, look at the help page or ask in the forums.

yonic_chastity_device is the tag for female chastity. It might be more practical just to search chastity_belt female though.

The tag implication chastity_device -> separation_(layout) (forum #437685) has been rejected by @spe.

crocogator said:
yonic_chastity_device is the tag for female chastity. It might be more practical just to search chastity_belt female though.

Yeah it could be a project of someone to search for both and check if "yonic" is there.